User talk:Beratademaj21

August 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of religious populations, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 19:11, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to UEFA European Championship, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 02:38, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2019–20 coronavirus pandemic

Please don't edit the amount of countries/territories, contrary to the guidelines in the article, as you did in your edit (amounts are to be rounded down). MattSucci (talk) 16:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Poor editing!

Please refrain from making poor and unconstructive edits, as you did in your edit. MattSucci (talk) 18:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 12:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

General Sanctions - COVID 19

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EvergreenFir (talk) 21:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic are largely not constructive. Please do not, for example, remove templated info in the infobox. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:34, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce community-authorised general sanctions,

you have been temporarily blocked from editing. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Reminder to administrators: Community sanctions are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or consensus at a community noticeboard (you may need to copy and paste their statement to a community noticeboard).

EvergreenFir (talk) 22:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]