User talk:Beraniladri19/Archive/2021/July
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Beraniladri19. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
July 2021
It clearly said TROPICAL DEPRESSION 1000 HPA AT 17N 112E NNW 10 KT for TD 07W and DEVELOPING LOW 1006 HPA AT 39N 158E FAR OFF EAST OF JAPAN MOVING NORTH 15 KNOTS. WINDS 30 TO 35 KNOTS WITHIN 300 MILES OF LOW. EXPECTED WINDS 30 TO 35 KNOTS WITHIN 500 MILES OF LOW EAST SEMICIRCLE AND 300 MILES ELSEWHERE FOR NEXT 12 HOURS for the Invest 97W.
That's wrong. "TROPICAL DEPRESSION 1000 HPA AT 17N 112E NNW 10 KT" is the position of Invest 97W. Please check the position on map and JTWC's TCFA graphic.— Preceding unsigned comment added by About123 (talk • contribs) 22:09, July 6 (UTC)
- About123, Sorry for replying late, it was caused becoz of my misreading of that website, sorry for reverting you were correct. Also don't forget to give an edit summary while reverting, in this way the person will understand why have you revert this edit.Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 08:37, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
A question relating to removing an editor's comment
In this edit you removed what looks to me like a perfectly good-faith comment, describing it as "vandalism ". Can you explain why you saw it as vandalism? JBW (talk) 09:19, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- JBW, Am sorry for that reversion, I didn't saw the edit clearly. But does people really comment in AIV ? Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 09:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- People rarely comment at
ANIAIV. Usually it's just a matter of an editor making a report and an administrator dealing with it, without any discussion. However, very occasionally an editor who has been reported posts a defence to the report, and in that case there's no reason why the reviewing administrator shouldn't be allowed to read it and take it into consideration. JBW (talk) 13:49, 9 July 2021 (UTC)- JBW, I'm talking about WP:AIV not WP:ANI Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 13:52, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I meant AIV, and just typed the wrong acronym by mistake. (What I said certainly doesn't apply to ANI, where there are often huge numbers of comments from various editors.) JBW (talk) 21:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- JBW, Ok I understood Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 02:34, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I meant AIV, and just typed the wrong acronym by mistake. (What I said certainly doesn't apply to ANI, where there are often huge numbers of comments from various editors.) JBW (talk) 21:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- JBW, I'm talking about WP:AIV not WP:ANI Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 13:52, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- People rarely comment at
Mini-Schengen area
Ok so you are threatening me with a ban because I reverted edits by someone who is clearly POV pushing, Kosovo is a state it has a Government, Presidency, Rule of Law and more. It's a "state" but partial recognised and that's a big difference. It's mentioned in the citation in Kosovo name with a small "a" and in the "Note" section explaining Kosovo situation with Serbia and international recognition. I did nothing wrong and yet you are threatening me. Kosovo is a STATE it's recognised by 51% of UN and Mini-Schengen area is a zone between Balkans and not UN. I didn't not add personal analysis or synthesis into articles and did not violate any rule unlike the other editor who has many warnings about his violations in Kosovo pages. Kosovo is a state/country as for now and forever since 2008. Go look the Washington 2020 agreement which Kosovo agreed to join this Union with Serbia, go look the Kosovo-Serbia relations page and see from all sides, and finally go look the recent news about the dialogue with Serbia and Kosovo negotiations process. It's mentioned at least 2 times in the lead with a citation about Kosovo issues with Serbia. Before you threatening someone with a ban make a page on Talk-page about this issue with other editors from Kosovo and Serbia. You also reverted my other edits, did my other edits violate any other wiki laws?
Beraniladri19
Buenos días, antes que nada sigo modificando los datos en todos los tableros, ya he agregado la fuente local de confianza previamente en Wikipedia pero la siguen borrando sin consultar la misma. Gracias. Cyclonephenom77 (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Cyclonephenom77, Ok, ¿qué fuente quieres agregar? Lo agregaré por ti. Tal vez se revirtió porque la fuente no tiene suficiente confiabilidad. (traducido al español por Google Translate porque no hablo español) Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 15:47, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Beraniladri19
I write now for both sides, correct data must be given about an event that seeks to inform an international audience, regardless of the language, because of the way I have reviewed how the different articles are written, I have only gotten to correct small data but very important data. Sorry for the inconvenience, okay? Cyclonephenom77 (talk) 16:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Umm...ok, I check. Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 17:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)