User talk:Bentzleyc/sandbox

I added links where appropriate. There are more which can be added probably. Everything seems to going well and the article is pretty robust already. Just make sure to track of which pieces of information came from where so that you dont have to track down your citations later.

Marcus Peer Review: Good History section, potentially move it above "Influence" so people can learn about its origins and then the larger impact after. Really liked the popular media section. One of the main reasons I use wikipedia is to find out information like that.

No everyone knows what "DIY" means so you might want to spell it out the first time or even just link to another Wikipedia article.

MQB11 (talk) 18:36, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, this page has good flow and organization because it is so easy to read. Most of all, the topic is very familiar to me and interesting. However, I think add a link on "DIY" is way better because some people might not understand the definition of that. Wnsgur3470 (talk) 18:44, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is really fascinating! I'm sure you know much of the information about the part off the top-of-your-head, but don't forget to include citations, otherwise it might get removed later, which would be a tragedy. Bridges2Information (talk) 07:00, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]