User talk:Bensin/Archives/2021

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bensin. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Proposed deletion of Advantage Hart

The article Advantage Hart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE that would help it pass WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:13, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

@Donaldd23: Hello! Unfortunately, I missed this message and was unable to respond to it. My recollection is that this article have been the subject of such discussions before with the result that it was kept, partly because there are several notable actors in it. Could you restore the page (and it's talk page) so that I can respond to this on the talk page? If you still disagree you may make a redirect or nominate it for deletion instead. --Bensin (talk) 13:05, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

@Explicit: Hello! I noticed you finalized this deletion. Could you restore the article and the talk page (subpage is OK) so that I can work on it? I put a lot of time and effort into that article, and I never got a chance to respond in the deletion process. Thank you! --Bensin (talk) 18:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Ə XPLICIT 02:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! I have added a source to the article. --Bensin (talk) 14:29, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Flightmare

The article Flightmare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 02:09, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

I answered on the talk page. --Bensin (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Flightmare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flightmare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flightmare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

I answered there. --Bensin (talk) 21:52, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Global Steak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Steak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Steak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 17:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

I answered there. --Bensin (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Valitor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valitor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valitor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Asketbouncer (talk) 15:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

I answered there. --Bensin (talk) 21:47, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Terrible Dogfish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portuguese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

OK. Now fixed. --Bensin (talk) 18:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blanche Neige

The article Blanche Neige has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film, appears to be a recording of a stage production, but the film is lacking significant coverage per WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 00:52, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

It seems you and another user already agreed to refocus and improve the article. --Bensin (talk) 16:33, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aron Flam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Doyle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

OK. Now fixed. --Bensin (talk) 10:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Peacemaker (1990 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peacemaker (1990 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peacemaker (1990 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 19:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination was withdrawn. --Bensin (talk) 11:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Stacy's Knights for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stacy's Knights is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy's Knights until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 20:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

I made a short comment and voted on the deletion page. The result was keep. --Bensin (talk) 22:10, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Adventures of Pinocchio (1911 film)

Hello, Bensin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Adventures of Pinocchio (1911 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

The draft has now been updated and submitted for review. --Bensin (talk) 16:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Adventures of Pinocchio (1911 film) (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The only source with significant coverage of the film is the film festival announcement. You want to have several independent, reliable sources with significant coverage (at least a paragraph or two, not an aside as in these sources) to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Adventures of Pinocchio (1911 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Adventures of Pinocchio (1911 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Bensin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

@Rusalkii: Thank you for your feedback after reviewing the draft article! I'm not sure what constitutes "new editors" mentioned in your invite to the Teahouse. I've been editing Wikipedia since 2005. :-) --Bensin (talk) 13:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

It's a default setting in the AfC helper script that looks for evidence of a teahouse invite and sends one if it doesn't see any on the page. Sometimes there are false positives, but I'd rather accidentally invite an experienced editor than miss a new one. Feel entirely free to ignore and/or complain about the kids these days teaching their grandmother to suck eggs etc etc :) Rusalkii (talk) 17:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

The invitation to the Teahouse is a nice gesture. Just removing the word "new" would make it more general. --Bensin (talk) 19:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)