User talk:Benjilrm

This user is a student editor in Stanford_University/Journey_to_Center_of_Earth_(Winter) .

Welcome!

Hello, Benjilrm, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Deep carbon cycling) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Deep carbon cycling.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for your new article on Deep carbon cycling, but I suspect that it is an unnecessary repeat of text from the previously-existing Carbon Cycle article. See Talk:Carbon cycle (March 15 comment).

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New article

I think you're off to a good start. I would recommend doing a few things

Trim Carbon_cycle#Deep_Carbon_Cycle down to a short summary. A paragraph, maybe two.
Add a lead section to the new article. The lead should start with something like The deep carbon cycle is... (much like the carbon cycle article opens) and then go on to summarize all the major points of the article.

Let me know if there's more I can help you with. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, I'm Jebcubed. I noticed that you recently removed content from Carbon cycle without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 15:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deep carbon cycle (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Deep carbon cycle instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is less extensive than the article. However, a comparison against the article is recommended, because there may be information in this draft that is not in the article that can be added. This draft will self-destruct in six months.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deep carbon cycle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deep carbon cycle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:50, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Benjilrm! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:50, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Deep carbon cycle concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Deep carbon cycle, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]