User talk:Benfrost3d

Tom Bodicoat

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Tom Bodicoat, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. matt br 15:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally I have deleted "{{spam}}" links, which are not permitted on Wikipedia, an image that has been tagged as a possible copyright violation and tagged the article as a suspected "{{hoax}}" as the person named on the article has zero google hits and is not locatable. Richard Harvey 17:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:TomWiki.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:TomWiki.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. matt br 15:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop vandalising the Brighouse article. If you continue to vandalise and write unverifiable articles you will be banned. Joe D (t) 15:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]