User talk:BenficaNNossaPaixao/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions with User:BenficaNNossaPaixao. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 1 — Archive 2

Orphaned non-free image File:José Maria Nicolau.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:José Maria Nicolau.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:39, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring

Hello, I just want to make you aware that you are edit warring at Jorge Nuno Pinto da Costa. Please use the articles talk-page to hash out your different opinions, or seek a third opinion. Lectonar (talk) 17:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Lectonar (talk) 18:36, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BenficaNNossaPaixao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why was I blocked if I was preventing vandalism? I demand to be unblocked. BenficaNNossaPaixao (talk) 18:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Wikipedia defines vandalism in a very specific way. It is not just "any edit you don't agree with". Edit warring is never the right thing to do. Your demand is denied. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:45, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Additionally, block evasion and personal attacks are always the wrong thing to do. When you are already in a hole, it is unwise to keep digging. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

File:José Maria Nicolau.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:José Maria Nicolau.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:52, 31 January 2013 (UTC)