User talk:Benevolent Dictator

Welcome!

Hello, Benevolent Dictator, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Exemplo347 (talk) 15:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mental health of Donald Trump. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I left the tag. Please do not blank the page, which prevents myself and my collaborators from collegially emending it to improve its deficits, if any. Let the consensus decide. Benevolent Dictator (talk) 15:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

can you read? I removed no tag. Stop lying.Benevolent Dictator (talk) 15:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The G10 tag blanks the page. By unblanking the page, you're removing the G10 tag. The fact that you're replacing it with a generic one (that means nothing) does not negate the fact that you're removing the tag. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wrong. You are not entitled to blank the page when it fails to meet the criteria you posted on its face, this is well-referenced notable info that does not "merely serve to disparage." We have thousands of other articles just like this. Wikipedia works on WP:consensus and I am entitled to my day in court. It is not you who is the dictator here. Benevolent Dictator (talk) 15:35, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's Noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Giant Snowman 15:57, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

tell me, how do your emperor's boots taste, sycophant? You are a sad little slave. Fuhrer Trump is lucky to have such an obedient lapdog.Benevolent Dictator (talk) 16:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]