User talk:Bendillon

Image copyright problem with Image:Logo-small-sbi.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Logo-small-sbi.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:12, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo-small-sbi.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo-small-sbi.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SJHS OldSeal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SJHS OldSeal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on St. Joseph High School (South Bend, Indiana). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John from Idegon (talk) 01:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bendillon. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to St. Joseph High School (South Bend, Indiana), but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bendillon. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bendillon|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. I just noticed that, save one edit, every edit you have made over the course of the 11 years you've been here has been to this article. Are you an employee of the school? Communication on Wikipedia is for the most part, transparent. There is no reason to send me an email and I certainly won't be replying. If you have something to say, say it here. John from Idegon (talk) 01:16, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]