User talk:Benahol

Welcome

Hello, Benahol, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Benahol, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zazas

There is no use in keep rewording whole sentences in Zazas when it's contradictory to the present reliable references. Adding one contradictory reference is still not good enough. --Semsûrî (talk) 09:30, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let's translate it into Turkish language Zaza. because it is more comprehensive and reliableBenahol (talk) 18:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let's translate Zaza language Benahol (talk) 20:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm giving the answer here.

(for Turkishness)

Fırat, M. Sherif. (1981) Dogu İlleri ve Varto Tarihi, Ankara:Turk Kulturunu Arastırma Ensıtusu. Tankut, Hasan Reşit, (2000) Zazalar Üzerine Sosyololojik Tetkikler, Istanbul:Kalan.

Benahol (talk) 21:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://web.archive.org/web/20150921212002/http://vvanwilgenburg.blogspot.com.tr/2009/06/erdogan-again-using-zaza-nationalist.html

Zazas are not called himself "Kurd" they are call himself "Zaza" Can you add it as a source to the page? Burtigin (talk) 19:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 21:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

El_C hope the Zaza page does not change while I am disabled. please note the changes made Benahol (talk) 21:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have not supported your changes with suitable sources, so that's doubtful. Note that if you engage in personal attacks again, the block is likely to be indefinite. El_C 21:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a lot of sources, uncertain ones are 1 or 2 sources. thank you for your opinions Benahol (talk) 21:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Semsûrî (talk) 22:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing, edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Zazas. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 00:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Semsûrî (talk) 18:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see the speaking section of the pages. Benahol (talk) 10:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copy paste

Hi Benahol, you can't add phrases like "Some chauvinistic people outside the Zaza community deny the existence of Zaza ethnicity."like you did here and then this is a phrase within a simple copy paste edit. Please adhere to the Wikipedia guidelines.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paradise Chronicle, I am trying to edit. Can you help. There is a section called reference. I could not fix it. Benahol (talk) 20:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I encourage you to make an extensive Wikipedia training tour (like 2 weeks) before making a single edit more at the Wikipedia main space. Several of your edits don't make sense, add up or are not at all neutral like the edits which included "chauvinistic" and "error-free".Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the 'Zazas' Turkish page on Wikipedia, you will understand. (here under the influence of Kurdish nationalists.)Benahol (talk) 20:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also your reply here, doesn't make sense. Also in the Turkish Wikipedia you'd have trouble while copy pasting and adding non-neutral words like chauvinistic and error-free to the Zaza article. You need to show diffs that explain your point of view in the discussions. If you can't do it, learn it. I have tried to clean up, what you added. You really, really need an extensive wikipedia welcome tour. This is a very, very well meant advice.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the advice. I'll be more careful. but some people are not malicious and neutral, they should not be on Wikipedia. also there is a 3-source section in the reference name you did not fix it.

[1] ?

Benahol (talk) 22:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References numbered 9.10.14 in the references section gives errors. Benahol (talk) 23:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benahol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really don't know why I'm blocked. Constantly complaining about me. Since he wants to edit the page as he wants. [2] he doesn't want to argue. he is doing vandalism and taking sides. Görüyor musun? Beni engelledikten sonra nasıl radikal değişiklikler yapıyor. talk.(there is vandalism and fascism) Semsuri states that I am blocked and shapes the pages as she wants. Benahol (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for edit-warring, it's stated pretty clearly in the block message and higher up on this talk page. As you are claiming fascism, I have extended your block indefinitely. That was breathtakingly inappropriate. If you apologise for that outrageous claim and can demonstrate a clear understanding of why your edits were inappropriate and how you'll resolve disputes going forward, any administrator should feel free to lift my part of the block. Yamla (talk) 13:59, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Yamla)Expressions I have specified for User:Semsûrî. You have blocked me instead of someone who does not allow explicit arrangements. It is he who adds data against Wikipeida's principle of impartiality. it does not allow editing. I have already explained. I no longer trust Wikipedia. You have a nice way. Just reading and looking would be enough. Benahol (talk) 14:34, 17 May 2020 (UTC) I just looked at the pages where I added a lot of source data. I saw how the efforts I made were destroyed. Page names should be Semsuri's opinions. Make a note that any changes contrary to Semsuri will be blocked. Even though I explained so much, not one of you has looked.[reply]

this is officially fascism.

Benahol (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Black Kite (talk) 17:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]