Jump to content

User talk:Ben Mandelson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ben Mandelson, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Ben Mandelson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

23:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthias Ballauff has been accepted

[edit]
Matthias Ballauff, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alessio Zaccone (May 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 07:25, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamming (physics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deformation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ben Mandelson. Thank you. – The Grid (talk) 00:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ben. I'm Kevin, an administrator here on Wikipedia. I would appreciate it if you could disclose any connection you may have to Michal Borkovec and/or Alessio Zaccone. It's OK if you're colleagues or work together; there are just some rules about what kinds of things you have to disclose, and to protect Wikipedia these rules are often enforced through user sanctions. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kevin, thank you for your message. I would like to confirm that I have been running the accounts Ben Mandelson, Michal Borkovec and Alessio Zaccone. These were meant to be alternate accounts (since I tend to use multiple pc's and I tend to forget passwords, and for reasons of anonimity). However, I have never used these accounts simultaneously for voting, malicious editing or other frauds on Wikipedia. The accounts have been used exclusively for creating/editing Wikipedia articles on a variety of subjects, particularly in the area of science and physics. To rectify and clarify this situation, I would like to declare these as alternate accounts explicitly; I apologize I was not aware about the exact procedure until now that I have read the rules and situations behind sock and meat puppetry. Also I can consolidate them into a single account (e.g. Michal Borkovec) and delete the alternate accounts if that is better in your opinion. Thanks. Best, Ben (aka Ben Mandelson ) 08:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ben, thanks for disclosing this. Yes, if you're using multiple accounts on the same topic area (the Zaccone paper), that's considered an illegitimate use of multiple accounts and raises a presumption of intent to deceive; your edits at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krausser–Samwer–Zaccone equation also pose the same problems and wasted valuable volunteer time. I am required by policy to block the sockpuppet accounts. Because you were forthcoming here, I will not block this account (Ben Mandelson); however, your broader pattern of editing is also concerning from an administrative perspective. If you have a conflict of interest with respect to Zaccone, as is apparent, you should review WP:COI and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide; you must disclose that you have such a conflict of interest, and you should generally submit edit requests rather than editing any page directly (see Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard). Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I have another question for you at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ben Mandelson and would appreciate a prompt response. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 04:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kevin, thank you for pointing out these issues. I am totally fine with the other accounts being closed down. I am also controlling the Ronny Lifshitz account, but I don't think I have ever used it at all, so feel free to have it also closed down. As for the future, I have now read the COI articles, that you pointed out, carefully, and from now on I will always submit to the edit submission and COI policies whenever this will be relevant/applicable. Thank you very much again for your help with this. Best, Ben

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]