User talk:BenCKP

Welcome!

Hello, BenCKP! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Peaceray (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:50, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BenCKP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, Yes this is another account my old ones were blocked from editing because all were the socketpuppet of NomanPK44. With NomanPK44 I used to do disruptive editing, especially on Indo-Pak-related pages that is the main reason I was blocked from editing from NomanPK44 account. Yes I know I have abused multiple accounts and I am extremely sorry for that. When I created this account I did decide that I will not do any disruptive edits and will always try to obey the Wiki rules u can also check the editing history of this account most of my edits were productive contribution and doesn't contain vandalism that's why I ask u to please allow me to use this account and unblock me. I have understand the wiki rules and how wiki works vandalism has no place here and I will always try to stop it and also not do it. BenCKP (talk) 13:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You obviously hadn't the slightest intention of following WP:SOCK or WP:EVADE. Yamla (talk) 13:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BenCKP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes I didn't follow socket rules and I am sorry for that. But u also have to realize that I don't have any other options I wanted to edit on Wiki that's why I use to create another account and when they get banned I didn't appeal because I thought the appeal won't get approved as I was doing somewhat disruptive editing with the new accounts as well but when I created this account I have decided that I won't be doing any disruptive editing and will be following the rules of the wiki that's why I always tried to not do and disruptive editing with this account. That is the main reason I am appealing to u that please reconsider and allow me to edit as I am not doing what I use to do with my previous accounts and don't keep me ban please. BenCKP (talk) 13:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You do have other options; you can abide by our rules. If you actually intend to follow our rules, you must stop socking no matter how much you want to edit. Your only possible pathway back to editing it to demonstrate your good faith by refraining from editing for at least six months(so no edits before November 25th) and at that time requesting unblock under your original account. If you aren't willing to do that, you are just wasting our time here. 331dot (talk) 13:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: Sorry for the ping but I want to ask that why some of my edits that were constructive have been reverted and even the pages that I created have been deleted per WP:BANREVERT. But WP:BANREVERT states that "This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a banned editor (changes that are obviously helpful, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand)". Please look into it. BenCKP (talk) 14:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure what you are asking. Edits by blocked users are not allowed to stand, as that would defeat the purpose of the block. It is true that it is not absolutely required, but keeping them is not required either. If an independent editor views the edit and sees merit in it, it will be restored. 331dot (talk) 15:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]