User talk:Belphegor 666

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Bullette, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 11:03, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your test

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Fire Star 14:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Belphegor 666, welcome to Wikipedia!

I noticed nobody had said hi yet... Hi!

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

You might like some of these links and tips:

some General guidance.
Tutorial and the Manual of Style.
Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
Use the Show preview button
Provide an Edit summary
Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
Take a look at Consensus of standards
Create a User page

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Unforgettableid 02:13, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message on my talk page

The context that was lacking for your article was that that worm is a D&D character and that D&D is an RPG. When I looked at your article I saw it was there already, so I deleted the no-context notice. Somebody else other than me or you must have added the context themselves.

See, in Wikipedia, whenever something needs fixing, people fix it. That's why if, let's say, you are not a professional writer, you don't have to worry. You can write as best as you can, and if there are grammar problems, someone else will see them and fix them later. In general, on Wikipedia, be bold. You'll do fine, and I'm sure you'll continue to make great contributions.

P.S. If you put four tildes like this ~~~~ after your posts on people's talk pages, it makes it easier for people to reply. :) Regards, --Unforgettableid | Talk to me 15:33, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

I'm afraid you can't just upload images other people own (like Image:FrostWorm.jpg, owned by Wizards of the Coast) or copy text verbatim (like the text you pasted into Bullette, which was copied from the AD&D Monster Manual, 1977 version). It's just not allowed here at Wikipedia, because it violates copyright law.

By doing this, not only do you make a lot of work that other people have to fix, but you subject Wikipedia to legal liability and don't improve the encyclopedia, as the copyright violations have to be deleted.

Please be more careful in the future, and read Wikipedia:Copyright. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 21:49, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message on my talk page

It seems someone else reverted the vandalism first. Oh well, the point is it's fixed.

Btw, there's no secret to reverting vandalism; the steps are listed at Wikipedia:Revert. Not obvious, but easier than it looks. :) --Unforgettableid | Talk to me 05:21, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blink dog article

I read your first article "Blink dog" and enjoyed it, so i wikified it. Keep up the good work! :) --Unforgettableid | Talk to me 19:47, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blink dog article

I read your first article "Blink Dog" and enjoyed it, so i wikified it. Keep up the good work! :) --Unforgettableid | Talk to me 19:47, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blink dog article

I read your first article "Blink Dog" and enjoyed it, so i wikified it. I also added comments on its talk page. (Just b/c you didnt wikify it doesnt make it a bad article. A good article, even if it has no wikilinks, is far better than no article at all.) Keep up the good work! :) --Unforgettableid | Talk to me 19:53, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Belphegor.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Belphegor.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn 19:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Worm-like creatures

Your article on worm-like creatures in fantasy appears to be a blend of wyrm and sandworm (Dune). Furthermore, its name does not fit with Wikipedia's article-naming conventions. Consequently, I have deleted it. Sorry. DS 18:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I was hoping to avoid the seperate wurms in fantasy by combining them into one. So that I don't get like the 12 dwarf types in list of fantasy species. Sorry, I'll try better next time Belphegor 666 21:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- That's okay; it's clear you meant well. DS 14:25, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ent.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ent.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Bulette

I have nominated Bulette, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulette. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Dæ dαlus^Contribs 02:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Blink dog

I have nominated Blink dog, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blink dog. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Dæ dαlus^Contribs 02:10, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Belphegor.gif

The file File:Belphegor.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frost worm

The article Frost worm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 11:58, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blink dog for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blink dog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blink dog (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 12:27, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bulette for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bulette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulette (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 11:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]