User talk:BellsFromSeychelles
Welcome to Wikipedia
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, BellsFromSeychelles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
allen四names 17:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
February 2010
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Krav Maga . Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Defender of torch (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- I noticed that most of your edits don't have edit explanations. Also, most edits on Krav Maga and Wikipedia for that matter don't have edit explanations, therefore I will leave one if I feel that it is warranted.BellsFromSeychelles (talk) 17:27, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is really nice to have the summaries though, because everything that is done here is supposed to be by consensus. It is hard to reach a consensus if we do not know each others reasoning. Read on as I would like you and I to come to an agreement about your recent changes to the Carradine article.--Ishtar456 (talk) 21:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Most of your edits don't have notes either. So, unless you follow your own suggestions, don't recommend them to others.BellsFromSeychelles (talk) 21:11, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is really nice to have the summaries though, because everything that is done here is supposed to be by consensus. It is hard to reach a consensus if we do not know each others reasoning. Read on as I would like you and I to come to an agreement about your recent changes to the Carradine article.--Ishtar456 (talk) 21:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- I noticed that most of your edits don't have edit explanations. Also, most edits on Krav Maga and Wikipedia for that matter don't have edit explanations, therefore I will leave one if I feel that it is warranted.BellsFromSeychelles (talk) 17:27, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Unsourced additions
[edit]The passage to which to which you made this addition is anchored by two references, neither of which contain the details you added. Please be certain that information added is backed up by reliable sources, or it will be removed. --RrburkeekrubrR 22:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- [Vandalism warnings removed]
- Hold your horses. The editor has provided a source. I agree what he/she is doing might be construed as disruptive and/or edit-warring, but "edits/reverts over a content dispute are never vandalism" --RrburkeekrubrR 22:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
STOP
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Carradine, you will be blocked from editing.
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Lee Myung-bak. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. --Caspian blue 12:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Blocked as a sock puppet
[edit]
You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.