User talk:BellaCYB

Disruptive edits

Please stop your disruptive edits. A stylization is not the common usage. You are breaking links all over the article and none of the references support your usage, even the artist's own usage. Again a stylization is not a common usage. You are also constantly breaking links and going against our manual of style. Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Re3hab, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 15:43, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

November 2024

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BellaCYB. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 13:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BellaCYB. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 16:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)