User talk:Bella86

January 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jessica McNamee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You are obviously the same IP that removed the same peice of information a few minutes ago Rain the 1 23:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re talk

Have you got a source of her public announcement? Was it covered on a website? All you have to do is present the link.Rain the 1 23:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not think I would not check the source you provided? Where in that source does it confirm anything you have been saying? You've created an account to cause trouble.Rain the 1 00:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again, I read the wrong source because you made a duplicate. It was my fault for not looking over it close enough. In future just bare in mind that if you provide the source like you did, no one will dispute that. I didn't know the magazine twisted her words - but because you did find the source - I now know - so thankyou. That is what Wikipedia is about, learning new things - and I now know something I did not know before.Rain the 1 02:24, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jessica McNamee, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Rain the 1 20:23, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]