User talk:Bella7790

October 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of dinosaurs. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. J. Spencer (talk) 22:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. mgiganteus1 (talk) 15:21, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shut Your Mouth, We All Know You Sold Me Out

The article Shut Your Mouth, We All Know You Sold Me Out has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing here that establishes any independent notability of the song

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kesha Rose

The article Kesha Rose has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find any references verifying this album.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 23:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kesha Rose for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kesha Rose is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kesha Rose until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 14:14, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm AJFU. Your recent edit to the page Indiana Evans appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AJFU (talk) 13:38, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Zarcusian (talk) 17:43, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Victorious 4.0.png

Thank you for uploading File:Victorious 4.0.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:39, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Victorious 4.0: Just a Little More Music from the Hit TV Show

The article Victorious 4.0: Just a Little More Music from the Hit TV Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not available for purchase anywhere. Only mentions on fan sites. Hoax

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Victorious. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:45, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Victorious 4.0: Just a Little More Music from the Hit TV Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kesha Rose album cover.jpeg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kesha Rose album cover.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Victorious 4.0: Just a Little More Music from the Hit TV Show for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victorious 4.0: Just a Little More Music from the Hit TV Show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victorious 4.0: Just a Little More Music from the Hit TV Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm blocking you because you've created several pages that were full of blatantly false information, such as creating articles for soundtracks that were never actually created, like the ones for Jessie and Victorious. (There's also the album for Kesha Rose, which was discovered to be another hoax at AfD back in May.) A look at your talk page history shows that you have done this in the past (adding in erroneous information to articles) and were specifically warned that this is seen as vandalism. This was brought up at ANI in the past and while no actions were taken, you still decided to create the hoax article Victorious 4.0: Just a Little More Music from the Hit TV Show. I have to ask: when someone reports you for deliberately adding false material (disrupting Wikipedia), why would you continue to add false material? The fact that they didn't punish you then does not mean that this was the admin board condoning these actions. This seems to be more than enough WP:ROPE to show that if left unblocked, you'd probably just continue on in the same behavior that you did before. I do see where you've tried to edit in a beneficial fashion but considering that you've been making hoax/vandalism edits since you signed up a year ago, I have to assume that you are WP:NOTHERE to positively contribute to Wikipedia. Creating hoax articles is absolutely unacceptable on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:R5 - Sometime Last Night.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:R5 - Sometime Last Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 01:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]