User talk:BellHooksSucks

April 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bell hooks have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bell hooks was changed by BellHooksSucks (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874532 on 2021-04-24T00:33:30+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bell hooks, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 00:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bell hooks, you may be blocked from editing. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 00:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:53, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BellHooksSucks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry it was only a joke, i wont do it again and i tried to undo my edits. Sorry Erik BellHooksSucks (talk) 00:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry you may well be, but that alone won't do. For starters, if you're serious about being unblocked to edit constructively, put in another request using {{unblock-un}} so you can request a username change, as usernames that attack identifiable people are against policy (and yes, your block message should have reflected that). — Daniel Case (talk) 20:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Now that you know such edits won't be tolerated on this project to write an encyclopedia of human knowledge, what constructive contributions do you wish to make? You're also going to need to propose a new username that does not attack another person. 331dot (talk) 08:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What relation do you have to the username Belhooksisstupid? 331dot (talk) 11:27, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BellHooksSucks. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]