User talk:Becky Sayles/Archive 10

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Becky Sayles. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

→

Hair Page Broken reference

Hello Becky,

I just wanted to point out that on page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hair in the references section, under notes, the title "Hair structures and hair life cycle" the link to follicle.com is broken. It should direct to www.follicle.org.uk/structure/

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ygiant (talk • contribs) 11:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 29 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Mercury (planet) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Resolved

Ed Sheeran amendments

Sorry Becky but I am completely new to Wikipedia! I put forward some amendments and somehow it seems they got through. I see you have replied asking for reliable source. I have replied (I think) by saying that I am a close family acquaintance in Framlingham and wanted to rectify anomalies on their behalf which the family find annoying as they are incorrect. I am not sure what else I can do. 2.101.3.153 (talk) 17:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

23:25:35, 29 January 2015 review of submission by Autogenictrainer

Autogenictrainer (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Wolfgang Luthe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Becky, thanks for reviewing the Luthe Draft. Please don't delete this draft for a month. I want to redo the references (reason for decline) but have so much work on it may take a while to do it). I appreciate so much that you didn't delete the draft. Re referencing I know that if information in an article is 'common knowledge' then it doesn't have to be referenced. This is a grey area re referencing as I know in the Autogenic fraternity a lot of the content in this draft is certainly common knowledge and no one person can be credited for this knowledge. Hope you can clarify thos grey are for me. Cheers and Thanks, Autogenic Trainer

Autogenictrainer (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thank you for responding to the edit request on the "Mika" page! Makaveli7184 (talk) 23:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)