User talk:Bebarlow

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ole Miss Rebels instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bebarlow/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /tlk 00:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bebarlow, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia /tlk 00:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your work on Tad Smith Coliseum

Hi bebarlow-
Contribution: 1163, 22:18 on 23 Nov
Revision undid: 03:44 on 24 Nov
Edits Lasted: 5 hours

Reason for reversal: Content was not properly sourced.
Source Material Comes from: http://www.olemisssports.com/facilities/ole-facilities-smith-coliseum.html

These are valid contributions to this article, but you did not reference the additions. Most of your new information comes from the above link, but you must include direct citations and add the source to the references page. Also, your new content is very similar to the sourced content. Revise to match the tone and voice of the article and to avoid plagiarism.

Recommendation: The new content could be added back into the article and properly referenced. I believe it would pass muster if sourced correctly. Adavis46 (talk) 15:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Bebarlow/sandbox

Hello, Bebarlow. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lakun.patra (talk) 07:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]