User talk:Beautimatic

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 05:49, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Your addition to Nusrat Jehan Academy has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dougweller (talk) 05:49, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you also added copyvio material to Tomb of Jesus and Polycystic liver disease. Dougweller (talk) 05:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright material can only be used if the procedures at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials are followed. Dougweller (talk) 08:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You might also want to read Wikipedia:Plagiarism. Dougweller (talk) 08:41, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to [:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tB2YELHX4g4], please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. This video appears to be a copyright violation. Unless you can show that it is not, please don't add it anywhere. Dougweller (talk) 18:12, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darul Ziafat

The article Darul Ziafat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to fail our criteria at WP:ORG - it is a religious facility providing free food and accommodation and I can find a reference to it here [1] but we need more substantial coverage to show that it is notable by our criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dougweller (talk) 18:19, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Masih ad-Dajjal

You need to read WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY. Edits must have sources that directly discuss the subject of the article and meet our criteria as reliable sources (see also WP:RS. You can't just use your own knowledge here, I'm afraid. Dougweller (talk) 18:25, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]