User talk:Beautiful War

Population

Your edits do not improve the quality of articles, while removing sourced info and breaking formatting. Please stop.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:17, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, what a message! Which edits are you referring to? Beautiful War (talk) 17:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You do not yet have so many, at least not with this user account, no? The latest ones, population of Russian districts and localities.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:20, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't made any edits that didn't improve the quality of articles, and I certainly haven't broken any formatting, so perhaps you could pick one specific edit you didn't like and explain why. As it is, I get the impression you simply didn't understand what I did. Beautiful War (talk) 17:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure you did break formatting, see e,g, here [1]. In any case, you need consensus for these edits.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you mean by "no reason given" [2] but in any case per WP:BLP you have to discuss before changing long-standing material. Please gain consensus for your edits first. In the meanwhile, I am reverting.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't edited any biographies of living persons, so again it seems that you simply don't understand what I did. By "no reason given", I obviously mean you haven't given a reason for your revert. Do you think you have? Once again I request, identify a specific edit you don't like, and explain why. Beautiful War (talk) 17:47, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, WP:BRD. I gave you an example above. You have broken the formatting. Additionally, you removed sourced information from the article, all in one edit.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what you are objecting to. You do not seem to be able to make it clear. I did not break any formatting - if you believe otherwise, describe exactly what you think I did. I do not need to get any consensus for rewriting non-sentences as sentences; that consensus already exists. What makes you think articles should not be written grammatically? Beautiful War (talk) 18:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, there is no consensus for that. Your edit has broken formatting, the reference is missing. If you are not able to see it, you should not be editing Wikipedia.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So let me get this clear, you don't think there is a consensus to write articles in full grammatical sentences? And you think I broke some formatting but you won't explain what that was? Beautiful War (talk) 18:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I opened a topic about your behavior at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Beautiful War - reverts, disruptive editing, and IDHT, please comment there.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What an absolutely incredible reaction to someone fixing grammatical errors. Beautiful War (talk) 18:50, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Beautiful War (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22595 was submitted on Sep 08, 2018 10:44:23. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]