User talk:Beatricewaxo

Welcome!

Hello, Beatricewaxo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Luksuh 00:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

getting permission

i am obtaining permission from www.waxorchard.com to have access to all their content including photos and artwork and text. Beatricewaxo 18:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re Wax Orchard

Whether this entity is notable I don't know, but the current article reads like an ad. If you want to recreate it in your own words, in a neutral tone, and with external references, we can look into whether or not it is sufficiently notable to have an article. Cheers, Herostratus 15:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re Wax Orchard

I have restored this article for the time being to let you copy the content, let me know when you have done this. Herostratus 21:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK sorry. It is restored now. Herostratus 01:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The text is now at User:Beatricewaxo/Wax Orchard. JuJube 03:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wax orchard has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 15:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three more reasons: (1) the label didn't seem to meet the notability tests of WP:MUSIC or WP:CORP; (2) there were no reliable sources cited (see WP:ATTRIBUTION; (3) given your username, I think there's a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest problem. NawlinWiki 17:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Beatricewaxo/Wax Orchard

A tag has been placed on User:Beatricewaxo/Wax Orchard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:User:Beatricewaxo/Wax Orchard|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 01:39, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]