User talk:Beatflow

Welcome!

Hello, Beatflow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 15:36, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eivan "Ricco" Bj

Why are you adding Eivan "Ricco" Bj as the executive producer on those articles? He does not appear on those releases. I will report you for vandalism if you continue in doing so.--z33k (talk) 14:48, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributes. However, you can not take away an executive producer on about thirty articles without doing proper research. Look through the references, and if its not there, do the research. I am sure that you are aware of that an executive is not the same as an regular producer, and sometimes its difficult to find the reference to all of them in some productions. Please revert the articles until you can prove otherwise, and I will not suspend you. Thanks for your history of good contributes and good luck for your further work with Wiki. Regards Larry

Per WP:BURDEN, The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. If you can't find a reliable source for the information, please don't add it. --Muhandes (talk) 15:40, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see WP:NOTVANDAL before calling another edit a vandalism. --Muhandes (talk) 15:41, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The reference is there. You can´t simply delete something without going through the list. About the term "vandalism", I agree - I used the term already pointed in z33k´s edition. Z33k`s has not done proper research - look at the timeline of his editions; edited with about a minute intervals - that is not according to Wikipedias policy.

Please, read those policies to which I pointed you. I have looked carefully, and I don't see any reference to the material you added. Per WP:BURDEN, If someone removes anything and you restore it, you are the one that has to clarify the sourcing, and not the other way around. However, even if the policy was the other way around, an edit aiming to improve an article is not vandalism, so please stop using that term, even if z33k used it first (and even if he may have been wrong in doing so). I have no idea what you are talking about when you say "edited with about a minute intervals - that is not according to Wikipedias policy". There is no policy I am aware of dealing with the interval between edits. --Muhandes (talk) 17:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]