User talk:BeasttoBeast

Welcome!

Hello, BeasttoBeast, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Charles (talk) 21:04, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Thanks.-- 23:12, 30 September 2012 (UTC)|User:BeasttoBeast (talk

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! BeasttoBeast, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Charles (talk) 21:05, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:11, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Hanks, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GSK ● talk ● evidence 22:27, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Tom Hanks as he appears in Apollo 13.png

Thank you for uploading File:Tom Hanks as he appears in Apollo 13.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. GSK ● talk ● evidence 22:28, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Apollo 13 actors.png

Thank you for uploading File:Apollo 13 actors.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. GSK ● talk ● evidence 22:29, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tom Hanks as he appears in Apollo 13.png

A tag has been placed on File:Tom Hanks as he appears in Apollo 13.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NtheP (talk) 22:40, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Apollo 13 actors.png

A tag has been placed on File:Apollo 13 actors.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NtheP (talk) 22:41, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Accepting that you downloaded the images from the Italian wikipedia, screenshots from films as new as Apollo 13 are not in the public domain and cannot be licenced as such. These are copyright violations both here and on the Italian wikipedia. NtheP (talk) 22:44, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User_talk:GSK, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. GSK ● talk ● evidence 22:48, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 24 hours

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Nick-D (talk) 23:22, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

BeasttoBeast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

65.130.136.64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "BeasttoBeast". The reason given for BeasttoBeast's block is: "Personal attacks or harassment".

Blocking administrator: Nick-D (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You aren't autoblocked, you're directly blocked. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:56, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Jack Swigert.png

Thank you for uploading File:Jack Swigert.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When making derivative images, you need to list the author of the image as credited in that image. In this case, NASA is the author of the original image. —C.Fred (talk) 02:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.---BeasttoBeast 02:57, 9 October 2012 (UTC)BeasttoBeast (talk)

Apollo 13 splashdown photo

Please make note of the correct way to code a picture inside an article:

[[File:Apollo13.jpg|thumb|250px|The crew of Apollo 13 on board the [[USS Iwo Jima (LPH-2)|USS ''Iwo Jima'']] following splashdown]]

The "thumb" argument is necessary; omitting it makes the picture full-size, and messes up the page. There also needs to be a caption. If you wanted to change the photo (in this case I think the color picture is an improvement), you only need to change the filename, but leave the rest.

However, there happens to be two things wrong with your Apollo 13 crew after recovery.png picture:

It isn't cropped correctly; it's very small in the upper left hand corner, with white space around it;
The PNG format should only be used for drawings, or renderings such as insignia. Photographs, and paintings, should be in JPG format.

Please spend a few minutes reading WP:Image use policy. JustinTime55 (talk) 21:27, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cosmic waves

The article Cosmic waves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable… whatever this is. No sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:49, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walter Cunningham.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Walter Cunningham.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:02, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:James Lovell in 1969.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:James Lovell in 1969.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing perfectly good pictures with itty bitty tiny ones isn't helping one bit. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Peyton List.png

A tag has been placed on File:Peyton List.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Original Image was at it:File:Diario_di_una_schiappa_2.png - that's on Italian wiki under the it-wiki fair use, not suitable for en-wiki. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Matterhorn Bobsleds in 2004.png

Thank you for uploading File:Matterhorn Bobsleds in 2004.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Super Mario Man 21:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to File:Apollo 13 crew after recovery.png and File:Splash Mountain at Walt Disney World with the lapbars.gif. Please include a direct URL in the "Source" parameter whenever you are creating a description page for a file - simple website names (e.g. "allears.net") are not sufficient. Second, are you sure that the latter image is in the public domain? The watermark reads "© Ashley Livingston". When a file is uploaded to Wikipedia, the sourcing and licensing information must be accurate. Thanks. Super Mario Man 21:56, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Matterhorn Bobsleds in 2004.png

A tag has been placed on File:Matterhorn Bobsleds in 2004.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I declined the speedy as I (eventually) found the image. Please put the url of the image in the box in future, and for images that are cc-by-sa-3.0, we must use the same license as the remote site. Images that cannot be checked will often get deleted. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, the Wikia.com image was found to be a copyright violation as well, all taken from Disney at http://www.certain.com/system/profile/web/index.cfm?PKwebID=0x224783d6e&varPage=activity Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:35, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Splash Mountain at Walt Disney World with the lapbars.gif

A tag has been placed on File:Splash Mountain at Walt Disney World with the lapbars.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSK ● talk ● evidence 21:57, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Apollo 13 crew after recovery.png

A tag has been placed on File:Apollo 13 crew after recovery.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSK ● talk ● evidence 21:57, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on the Administrator's Noticeboard

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --GSK ● talk ● evidence 22:10, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cosmic waves

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cosmic waves requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GSK ● talk ● evidence 20:19, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of King Triton Gardens

The article King Triton Gardens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Why does this deserve its own article? It should be contained within a main article like Tomorrowland.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSK ● talk ● evidence 07:17, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When you edit, you are provided with two windows. The second, smaller window is titled Edit summary (Briefly describe the changes you have made). Your contributions, currently open for discussion here, seem to lack any non-automated edit summaries. In future, please supply edit summaries. -- Hoary (talk) 00:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image links

Welcome to Wikipedia. It appears that you have added a link to an image on an external website to Fantasyland, likely in an attempt to display that image on the page. For technical and policy reasons, it is not possible to use images from external websites on Wikipedia. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request an upload. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:56, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Matterhorn Bobsleds, you may be blocked from editing. Stop replacing images with terrible quality versions. GSK ● talk ● evidence 05:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tom Hanks as Jim Lovell.png

A tag has been placed on File:Tom Hanks as Jim Lovell.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSK ● talk ● evidence 05:16, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MatterhornBobsled 2012.png

A tag has been placed on File:MatterhornBobsled 2012.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSK ● talk ● evidence 05:16, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:New Bobsleds.png

A tag has been placed on File:New Bobsleds.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSK ● talk ● evidence 05:16, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012 (2)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Spencer^T♦C 06:34, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

You have uploaded several image files where a small image is pasted into the corner of a large area of white. Have you some reason for creating in this format? It is pointless - such images are useless here. Please stop it. Also pay attention to copyright. I saw at least one blatant copyright violation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:01, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Nemo Submarine Voyage.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nemo Submarine Voyage.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jeopardy!. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GSK ● talk ● evidence 02:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, BeasttoBeast. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Go Phightins! 01:14, 26 October 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Slovenliness

Your last three uploads have been flagged for deletion because of your slovenliness. Assuming you took these images from the web, it would have been perfectly easy for you to provide for each one links to the image itself and a page which uses it and contains an indication that the image is PD. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Steady, Beast is still learning the ropes here. And quite likely learning about copyright and graphics formats at the same time. Rich Farmbrough, 23:42, 27 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Rich, how long should I give him? Surely after twenty deleted uploads he can be considered to have been informed about copyright and formats. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, I understand this is frustrating for you, but as far as I can see no one has told Beast what "PD" stand for (public domain), let alone explained the way licensing works on Wikipedia (which can really only be done simply by missing bits out). Rich Farmbrough, 12:52, 28 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]

I question whether Rich understands PD if he can leave a {{PD-ineligible}} in place when it is patently inappropriate. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:47, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You do? I question whether you understand that these grumpy responses do not make for good interaction. I tracked down a couple of images, which, while you are perfectly correct should not be necessary, was almost trivial. I did not say that I had fixed the licensing tags - nor is there any requirement on me (or you) to do so. This is a volunteer project, which I remember you enjoying back when the historic London telephone exchanges were being documented, and you were doing all sorts of other fun stuff. Maybe you are still enjoying it but it rarely seems that way. Rich Farmbrough, 00:14, 29 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BeasttoBeast for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. GSK ● talk ● contribs 18:33, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am the same person. My dad changed the password on my account so I can't get into it. Until I figure out what it is, I have to keep editing with my current IP address. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.130.252.50 (talk) 18:35, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BeasttoBeast for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. GSK ● talk ● contribs 18:18, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BeasttoBeast for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 18:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BeasttoBeast. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 19:09, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BeasttoBeast for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 23:09, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account, which contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BeasttoBeast, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and admit to it now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Eeekster (talk) 19:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BeasttoBeast. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 22:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kevin bacon cropped.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kevin bacon cropped.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. XXN, 14:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Jim Lovell cropped.png

The file File:Jim Lovell cropped.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused crop of File:Apollo 8 Lovell at Guidance and Navigation station.jpg, no apparent reason to retain

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:57, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]