User talk:Beast of traal

License tagging for Image:Example of a point.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Example of a point.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

I will change that now. Beast of traal T C 22:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC) Beast of traal[reply]

Done Beast of traal T C 22:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC) Beast of traal[reply]

Anti-gravity

Michael Busch has requested a straw poll of Anti-gravity. You may want to add your comments. Tcisco 01:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phenomenon+(philosophy)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Phenomenon+(philosophy), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 00:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. When I see a reference to Kant, I think philosophy, not physics. Your article showed all the signs of being about the former. As to deletion, that's just my recommendation. You have about five days to make the distinction clear. If I were you I'd put an explanation of where the article is going in its talk page. That way it won't get deleted in an incomplete form. But if you're going to write about physics, your article's title is more than a little misleading. Hope that helps. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 01:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I see now, I think. Problem is I see it as a new page and judge it against criteria which do not assume prior knowledge of behind the scenes reorganisation. I'll take the tag off and put an {{under construction}} tag on it so no-one else falls into the same trap. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 01:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phenomena pages

ARe they in order? They both seem to point to the same thing. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relativity Project userbox

Hi there. Thanks for creating that userbox. Much appreciated. :) MP ^{(talk•contribs)} 21:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image tagged for delete

Hi.

I tagged Image:Possible orbits.jpg for deletion, per the Talk page there. Easy enough to come up with a fix if you want to take the time. kwami 10:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for redoing that. I still see a couple problems, though:

The binaries are (a) Trey and Patru, and (b) Tano and Sitha. I believe both binaries have to orbit outside Onos' orbit.
I doubt Onos and Dovim, the two other stars, could share an orbit. You'd need four orbits, one each for Onos, Dovim, and the two binaries.

kwami 20:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I figure it this way: Since the binaries have to be outside K's orbit, and the closest stars appear to be Tano & Sitha (they're so close - distance of Saturn - it's unlikely any others are closer), what we have is Onos orbiting a common barycenter with Tano & Sitha. That triple system then orbits a common barycenter with Trey and Patru. Don't know where Dovim is. It might be closer than Trey/Patru since it's so faint, but that would be hard to draw, so maybe it's easier to assume it orbits outside the other five, as Proxima does in Alpha Centauri. kwami 20:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox test

This is a test of the editing capability of iPhones.Beast of traal T C _ 02:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)beast of traal[reply]

Physics portal

Thanks for adding a selected article/photo for November. Now that it is almost December, can you ipso quicko create ones for December and January? I think we should have them ready a couple of months ahead of time. If there are any new developments in physics the selected article can be changed at any time but it is terrible for the calendar to role over and the automated links just come up with broken links. Thanks. 199.125.109.136 (talk) 23:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your distinctiveness will be added to our own

I love the borgbox. I tweaked it a bit, I hope that's ok. I know - I should've heeded your warning. But warnings are irrelevant! =) xenocidic (talk) 14:39, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pluto Userboxes

Your Pluto userboxes appear to contain a picture of Mars not Pluto. AstroMark (talk) 21:45, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about using a portion of this image?: Image:2006-16-d-print.jpg AstroMark (talk) 09:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Physics participation

You received this message because your were on the old list of WikiProject Physics participants.

On 2008-06-25, the WikiProject Physics participant list was rewritten from scratch as a way to remove all inactive participants, and to facilitate the coordination of WikiProject Physics efforts. The list now contains more information, is easier to browse, is visually more appealing, and will be maintained up to date.

If you still are an active participant of WikiProject Physics, please add yourself to the current list of WikiProject Physics participants. Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 14:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Physics Poll

There is currently a poll about WikiProject Physics in general. Please take some time to answer it (or part of it), as it will help coordinate and guide the future efforts of the Project. Thank you. Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 18:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Uranium-241

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Uranium-241, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Potatoswatter (talk) 11:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Science Debate Forum

Hello,

I am electricRush and I would like to invite you to join the Science Debate Forum. It is open to anyone who has an interest in science, and is completely free. We have a welcoming community and discussion forums in all subjects ranging from cosmology to physics to politics. In general it is a great discussion board that fits all scientific interests.

Thanks, -electricRush (T C)^Sign! 05:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revisions to Ideal Machine

I have made revisions to the introduction of the article Ideal Machine. Please feel free to revert them, if you do not find them helpful. I have learned that there are some who feel a machine is not mechanical. Along the same lines, I have a little trouble with the section use in physics. This seems to be rather imprecise. Again, I am happy to leave it as it is, if you and others feel it is informative. Prof McCarthy (talk) 20:43, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!