User talk:Bearguardian

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bearguardian, and you are therefore blocked indefinitely.
If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Arthur Firstenberg

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Arthur Firstenberg. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Firstenberg. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bearguardian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am the subject of this article. I attempted to correct some errors about me a number of years ago, and was blocked from doing so. I don't remember the details, but I became extremely frustrated and at some point I logged in as Nevetsnairb and was equally unsuccessful. My roommate, Victoria Jewett, using the only computer in our house, also tried to correct the errors. She logged in as Jujuvee, and after she did that, both she and I were permanently blocked from editing. Because we used a common computer, I was accused of sockpuppetry. At that point I threw up my hands and said to myself that this is more trouble than it's worth. Another colleague, Dr. William J. Bruno, of Los Alamos National Laboratories, succeeding in getting a couple of the errors corrected from his own computer. Now several years have passed, and a new paragraph has been added to the article about me. I would like the opportunity to edit this last paragraph to make it more factual and to add the fact that my lawsuit against my neighbor is not over, but is presently being considered by the New Mexico Court of Appeals.

Decline reason:

It's much better if you don't write about yourself on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.