User talk:Bear and Dragon

To get in touch with me, leave a message. Note that I will usually respond on your talk page. Thanks!

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Bear and Dragon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - NYC JD (interrogatories) 23:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unfair criticism

I think the blanket disaproval you left on my talk page was unfair and aggressive. I believe all changes and edits I made are fair and accurate. If you have a specific problem or question, let me know and I'll try to work it out, but 'stam' to attack is not fair nor nice. I may be new and inexperienced, and I may make mistakes, but I am not deliberatly trying to disrupt. A Kosher'n frailichen Pesach Lobbuss 08:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explain why that article is not using weasel words

Also, explain me how many orthodox shuls have changed their havoro to sefardish? I stick with what I say. Lobbuss 08:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How many really keep shabbos, tznius Taharas HaMishpocho properly? If you want, we can find a peshoro, change the labelling to 'mizrochi Jews' or 'modern-orthodox jews' or whatever you like, but to give a blanket statement that is mashma that it is accepted by the mainstream chareidim is motzei shem ro, and a giant chillul Hashem r"l. Which poiskim permitted changing havroro, by the way? Lobbuss 09:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry. I know hilchos loshen horo gantz fine. Reb Moshe never said such a thing. (He spoke about changing back actually) also he has a teshuva about changing nusach. If I belong in a mental hospital because I think people with krum hashkofos are 'felt' in yiras-shomayim, then I'll happily go - together with royv frum klal yisroel. I am in no way Neturei Karta, if that's what you think, and I do not support those who went to Iran. What is your 'teitch' of non-religious? Someone who keeps kashrus but not shabbos? Or shabbos but not taharas hamishpocho? Or who doesn't cover her hair? Or anyone who doesn't eat on yom-kippur is in the geder of 'religious'? I already said, change it to 'modern-orthodox' or whatever, but don't let it be there 'stam'! Lobbuss 09:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HTML comments

Please be advised that HTML comments are written as . If they are not written this way, they will not work. -- Ynhockey ^(Talk) 13:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bet Shemesh

Other than the fact that I am supposedly unexperienced (I assume you have more experience, even though you registered 4 days ago) - what is the reason not to merge RBS to Bet Shemesh, after all participants in the discussion agreed to do it?

If you know the proper way to merge - please do it.

Thanks, Happy138 20:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Temples" in Metzger quote

Hi. Firstly, even if it is irrelevant, it is a direct quote and should not be changed. Secondly, Temples is also a synonym for synagogues, especially in a translation (Mikdash M'at) -- Avi 15:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Daniel575 (5th) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

AfD nomination of Kamsha

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kamsha, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamsha. Thank you. Mr Stephen 10:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sanhedrin

BS"D

Doniel, I know its you, and historian isn't going to give up, we might as well, while we and the rest of the Frum editors are in the shaas rachamim, pull him to the facts of real life. Kol Tuv and b'shaah Toivah --Shuli 13:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA !vote

I don't think that this [1] makes you look very good. Besides, (and more importantly) I and most other supporters want to know your rationale for opposing, because you may persuade us that our trust is misplaced and we should also oppose. I wouldn't want to support a bad candidate. --Dweller 15:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rabbi

Firstly, Daniel, I don't need to offer an explanation, but I'll be civil. We don't always use "he" it gets too repetitive and boring. As per consensus, we use the subject's last name. That is the standard convention among all encyclopedias as well as all the Rabbi projects. (And FYI, I noticed that you had no problem with my edit to Rabbi Kook's article.) Yossiea ^(talk) 16:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked you for the time being for evading the block on your previous account with this one.--Isotope23 16:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Daniel575 (5th).--Isotope23 16:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiology task force

Cardiology task force is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Cardiology on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of participants at Cardiology task force Participants. ECG Unit (Welcome!)

-- Addbot (talk) 00:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

T.F.AlHammouri (talk) 12:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)

Get free access to research!

...Support Open Access...

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 20:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]