User talk:BGsynch21
| This user is a student editor in UCLA/Psychology_220A_(Fall,_2021) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, BearGoldstein, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
A belated welcome and Neural Synchrony
[edit]Dear BearGoldstein, thank you for the Neural Synchrony article, it really is an interesting article. After a short review I have some suggestions which would be helpful for both the GA and the DYK review. There are some uncited paragraphs and phrases within the article, which I believe can be found in the article. Maybe you could help with that. And for the DYK, a link to the article where the information can be read, would be very helpful. I haven't seen it by now. Else, I hope you enjoy Wikipedia and happy editing, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Dear Paradise Chronicle, thank you very much for reviewing my article and for the kind words! I've added a few more citations. There shouldn't be anymore paragraphs without citations, barring the intro/overview paragraphs (which are mainly just a summary of heavily cited material in the body of the article). I've also added a reference to the DYK hook. Once again, thank you for your help! I appreciate you taking the time to help me improve the article. BearGoldstein (talk) 21:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Neural synchrony
[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Neural synchrony at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- The reviewer has made more comments, and noted some work that still needs to be done on the article before it can be approved for DYK. Please stop by as soon as possible. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:29, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Neural synchrony
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Neural synchrony you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Neural synchrony
[edit]
On 31 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Neural synchrony, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that guitarists playing a duet together have been shown to be in neural synchrony? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Neural synchrony. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Neural synchrony), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Neural synchrony
[edit]The article Neural synchrony you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Neural synchrony for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)