User talk:Beanieshark05

February 2022

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Harmony of the Seas, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 21:20, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Caribbean International. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Harmony of the Seas, you may be blocked from editing. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:58, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am telling the truth about royal caribbean Beanieshark05 (talk) 07:00, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please take care when editing pages such as Royal Caribbean International. I have reverted your most recent edit as it was showing repeated sections of teext. Gusfriend (talk) 11:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Caribbean International. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:15, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Hut 8.5 13:29, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unblock|reason because I am telling the truth about companies and if you unblock me, I promise I won't do it again}} Beanieshark05 (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beanieshark05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've learnt my lesson and I won't do it again. Beanieshark05 (talk) 07:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Great. Please demonstrate your understanding by telling us what the lesson is, what you will do differently in the future, and what edits you plan to make. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|reason= my lesson is not to vandalise and in the future, I will only make edits when I need to or any spelling errors. The edits that I plan to make are the spelling mistakes only}} Beanieshark05 (talk) 18:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unblock|reason because my lesson is not to vandalise and in the future, I will only make edits when I need to or any spelling errors. The edits that I plan to make are the spelling mistakes only}} Beanieshark05 (talk) 18:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beanieshark05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason because my lesson is not to vandalise and in the future, I will only make edits when I need to or any spelling errors. The edits that I plan to make are the spelling mistakes only

Decline reason:

Frankly, that's not enough. We have plenty of people who correct spelling mistakes, and you've demonstrated you plan to actively harm Wikipedia. So, the reward simply isn't worth the risk of unblocking you. Yamla (talk) 10:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|reason because I promise that I won't actively harm Wikipedia again. I will only edit a Wikipedia page if I need to or to provide information that isn't there or if there is a page that isn't edit and I promise that I won't do it again and I've learnt my mistake}} Beanieshark05 (talk) 17:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hut 8.5, I would like to be unblocked so I can edit Wikipedia please. I promise that I won't vandalise Wikipedia again. I have learnt my mistake and I know how much people rely on Wikipedia for their information and I want to give people that information they need that wouldn't overwise be created.

Please may you consider my request for being unblocked and I promise that I won't let you down if you unblock me.

Beankeshark05 Beanieshark05 (talk) 17:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beanieshark05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason I promise that I won't actively harm Wikipedia again. I will only edit a Wikipedia page if I need to or to provide information that isn't there or if there is a page that isn't edit and I promise that I won't do it again and I've learnt my mistake

Decline reason:

We will consider unblocking your account if you follow the instructions in the standard offer. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:49, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Beanieshark05 (talk) 14:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beanieshark05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

because I promise that I won't actively harm Wikipedia again. I will only edit a Wikipedia page if I need to or to provide information that isn't there or if there is a page that isn't edit and I promise that I won't do it again and I've learnt my mistake

Decline reason:

Your best chance of being unblocked is to take the standard offer, and re-apply in 6 months time with no socking. PhilKnight (talk) 07:58, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Beanieshark05 (talk) 20:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=Dear Wikipedia moderators, I am asking for my block to be reviewed by taking the standard offer as I have waited 6 months with no socking. I have no learnt by misusing Wikipedia is wrong and I have understood how misusing the site can lead to misinformation for billions of people to get their information on what ever topic they are interested in. I truely understand of what I did is wrong and I promise that I won't ever mistreat Wikipedia ever again. I have let the adminstrators that work extremely hard on making sure the pages are the most up to date information, I have let the billions of people who use this amazing website to get their information down and I have also let myself down and I truely regret my editing decisions earlier. I am truely sorry. Please may you give me a second chance on editing pages on Wikipedia through the standard offer? If you accept my appeal, I am truely greatful and promise that I won't the WIkipedia community down and if you still decline my offer, I understand and take full responsbility for my actions. Thank you for reading this appeal and I hope you can let me be able to edit Wikipedia pages again and make sure the pages are up to date with the correct information and not vandalising the pages.

Your sincerly.

Beanieshark05 } Beanieshark05 (talk) 17:38, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal to my ban

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beanieshark05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia moderators, I am asking for my block to be reviewed by taking the standard offer as I have waited 6 months with no socking. I have no learnt by misusing Wikipedia is wrong and I have understood how misusing the site can lead to misinformation for billions of people to get their information on what ever topic they are interested in. I truely understand of what I did is wrong and I promise that I won't ever mistreat Wikipedia ever again. I have let the adminstrators that work extremely hard on making sure the pages are the most up to date information, I have let the billions of people who use this amazing website to get their information down and I have also let myself down and I truely regret my editing decisions earlier. I am truely sorry. Please may you give me a second chance on editing pages on Wikipedia through the standard offer? If you accept my appeal, I am truely greatful and promise that I won't the WIkipedia community down and if you still decline my offer, I understand and take full responsbility for my actions. Thank you for reading this appeal and I hope you can let me be able to edit Wikipedia pages again and make sure the pages are up to date with the correct information and not vandalising the pages. Your sincerly. Beanieshark05

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion. It is not true that you have gone 6 months with no socking. Therefore, you are not eligible for consideration under WP:SO until six months from today. That would be 2023-02-09. And only if you refrain from any further block evasion. At that time, you'll need to account for your attempt to mislead us with this request. This will significantly count against you as you have worked hard to demonstrate you still cannot be trusted. Yamla (talk) 18:15, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beanieshark05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Do you have any evidence against this?

Decline reason:

Misuse of the appeal template. Declined below. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beanieshark05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can I see the evidence against me

Decline reason:

No, you can't see the evidence, but I can. Logging into your accounts from the same single-allocation range back-to-back to ask essentially the same question posed as an appeal demonstrates how very bad you are at subterfuge. I suggest you find another hobby. As you're wasting admin time posting inappropriate appeals and being untruthful regarding your socking, I'm revoking talk page access. As you are aware, the standard offer is available. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:11, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.