User talk:Beale ciphers
Taejo of Joseon
[edit]Please stop editing the dates of birth and death. They are given in the lunar calendar to maintain the article's cohesiveness. Except for the dates of a few major events (usually concerning the births/deaths of monarchs), most of the dates of important moments in the history of pre-20th century Korea are only available in the lunar calendar; if a combination of multiple calendars is used it only results in confusion for people who aren't familiar with the subject. For example, you might be told that this king started this war on this date according to lunar calendar (with no equivalent date in the gregorian calendar available), while he might no even be king at that point according to the gregorian calendar. Maria0215 (talk) 21:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- November 4th of the solar calendar Beale ciphers (talk) 06:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- You have already been warned. Stop your disruptive editing. I refrained from reporting you because it's obvious from your history that you aren't familiar with wikipedia editing. However, if you continue to ignore the warnings and the multiple reverts of your unnecessary edits, you will be reported which can result in a block/ban. We do not need you to tell us that you are using the solar calendar. We know it, and as the comment above is saying, STOP DOING IT because you are only creating confusion for readers. Jenriam (talk) 02:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Augustine Washington. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 00:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Augustine Washington, you may be blocked from editing. Shearonink (talk) 14:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/21506/augustine-washington Beale ciphers (talk) 01:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Find A Grave as your source? It's a user-generated source and is not considered reliable. It cannot be used in a WIkipedia article to verify content asserted as a fact (see its listing at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources.
- Beyond that you are ignoring two other reliable sources 1)Mount Vernon and 2)the Encylopedia of Virginia. If you continue in this editing pattern it will be disruptive behavior. You need to stop. Shearonink (talk) 12:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Johann van Beethoven, you may be blocked from editing. Shearonink (talk) 20:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Augustine Washington, you may be blocked from editing. Shearonink (talk) 14:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Augustine Washington shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
And also at Johann van Beethoven. Shearonink (talk) 21:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Johann van Beethoven, you may be blocked from editing. The "12 November" date is not reliably-sourced. You are ignoring 2 valid reliable sources. Shearonink (talk) 18:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
New message from Shearonink
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Augustine Washington § Recent edits.... Shearonink (talk) 13:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.