User talk:BeLucky/2023/March

Archives

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shyam Manav (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No editor is going to sort through the WP:REFBOMBing. Showing notability is about the quality of the sources, not the quantity. Can you point out the specific references that show how the subject is notable?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shyam Manav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:06, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 You are correct; I may have gotten carried away. My intention was not to engage in WP:REFBOMBing, but rather to add useful sources for the purpose of improving the article, so that other editor(s) may refer to them as they continue to expand it. --BeLucky (talk) 04:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Then I would recommend removing any references that are not needed as it is not about quantity, but rather quality. Alternatively you can point out the references that you feel show notability; however, the former option would be best. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 As per your suggestion removed extra references. And resubmitted for your review. --BeLucky (talk) 09:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 Here you can read about him. To keep it short giving only very few references here:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-64480726

https://www.bbc.com/hindi/india-64413434

https://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/interview-fanatics-dominate-every-field-control-our-lives-shyam-manav-1877483 --BeLucky (talk) 13:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest pointing these references out in a comment on the draft as I may not be the person who reviews it. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 Done everything as per your sugesstion. Kindly review it and approve. Thanks for guidence. --BeLucky (talk) 07:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it still contains WP:REFBOMBing. If I reviewed it, I likely would not approve it. You have submitted it for review so I will allow another editor to have a look with fresh eyes. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up of Dhirendra Krishna Shastri

Thanks for your efforts to clean up the article on Dhirendra Krishna Shastri.

Your edit left some stray citations - I have moved them to the article talk page.
Please be cautious about labelling edits as minor edits. See WP:Minor edit.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:19, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhirendra Krishna Shastri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tantric.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]