User talk:Bdt1
|
December 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tony Di Carlo has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://youtube.com/tonydicarlo (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:29, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
The article Tony Di Carlo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- no evidence of notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sgroupace (talk) 11:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Tony Di Carlo
[edit]I have nominated Tony Di Carlo, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Di Carlo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Favonian (talk) 13:13, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User:Mm40, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 15:14, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- And if you saw what that vandal wrote on my page, you'd understand that he was indeed a (offensive word). Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:24, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Di Carlo, you will be blocked for vandalism. You have removed an administrative comment from an AfD page. This could be construed as an attempt to sabotage the deletion process. Don't ever do that again! Favonian (talk) 09:55, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hey man, could you stop deleting the word "bastard" from User:Mm40's award? Wikipedia is not censored. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello!
I just wanted to give a piece of friendly advice. When discussing an article nominated for deletion, it is adviseable to follow the suggestions listed at Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#General advice. Most people don't like to see their work deleted and they can have strong feelings about that. However, voting more than once (you've voted four or five times to keep the article) is considered badgering of the editors who voted to delete the article and can be considered rude. I would advise you to not place any additional votes in the above discussion. Your opinion has been duly noted and will be taken into consideration when an administrator makes a final decision on whether to keep or delete the article; additional "keep" votes from you may actually hurt your chances of keeping the article.
Thanks! Big Bird (talk • contribs) 15:09, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Dcmodel.png & File:Tdcfword.png
[edit]I have some concerns with these two files.
File:Dcmodel.png
[edit]You say you are the copyright holder of this work, can you explain how that came about? - did you take the picture?
File:Tdcfword.png
[edit]Again you say you are the copyright holder of this work, however you say it was di carlo on the f word - is it a screen grab from the program - if so then you are not the copyright holder.