User talk:Bcn0209

IT WAS AN ACCIDENT

First and most importantly, It was an accident that I deleted the speedy tag. I have NEVER done so before and, I immediately replaced it myself!

Spam in Made-To-Order Digital Manufacturing Enterprise

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Made-To-Order Digital Manufacturing Enterprise, by RHaworth (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Made-To-Order Digital Manufacturing Enterprise is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Made-To-Order Digital Manufacturing Enterprise, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't there any disinterested sources?

I'm writing you a note because you seem to be able to make genuinely good contributions. Aren't there any disinterested parties that reference you? A textbook on the subject? Anything? Nothing says that you can't write articles that reference yourself at all, just that materials you create about yourself (or that you pay someone else to create) cannot be the primary basis for an article. At the very least, writing articles about your industry segment still is beneficial to you, even if you can't come out and say that your products are the best.

Note, by the way, that the Terrafugia article includes external references, and contains a substantial description of why their product is likely to never work properly. In fact, over half of the article is devoted to skepticism. Kww 14:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retort

I actually enjoy your response. It is objectionable and fair so, let me retort: More than half of my post was also criticism. Secondly, I am an advisor for the Direct Digital Manufacturing technology counil to the Society of Manufacturing Engineers. It is an emerging field. who better to write about it than one of its founders and leaders in the field?

Talk pages

If you have a message for Premeditated Chaos, leave it on ~~his~~ her talk page, not ~~his~~ her user page. android 79 20:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Her, actually. It even says that on the page. =P ♠PMC♠ 02:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I only looked at the diffs. I didn't even glance at your page. android 79 02:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's all good, it happens way more often than you'd think, pink userpage or not =) ♠P M C♠ 18:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Honorable James D squier.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Honorable James D squier.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Bcn0209! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 178 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

James D. Squier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:11, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bryan C Norman.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bryan C Norman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:51, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James D. Squier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James D. Squier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James D. Squier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pudge MclameO (talk) 02:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My main point is that there need to be sources that show his notability. Please by all means add them so we can keep this. We aint no paper!! tyvm Pudge MclameO (talk) 05:21, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:P5290102D.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:P5290102D.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:43, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kraftwurx

A tag has been placed on Kraftwurx, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 18:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kraftwurx for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kraftwurx is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraftwurx until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 07:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

James D. Squier

Hello Bcn0209,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, James D. Squier, may be copied from http://wikibin.org/articles/james-d.-squier.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:31, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of James D. Squier

A tag has been placed on James D. Squier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 08:18, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kraftwurx

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Bovlb (talk) 23:46, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Digital Factory screenshot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Digital Factory screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Mifter (talk) 01:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Image is correctly marked. I am the copyright holder and the image is part of an article being developed for publication on Wikipedia. What needs to change to ensure that it is NOT deleted?

Orphaned non-free image File:Digital Factory icon.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Digital Factory icon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Chris+Norman.gif

The file File:Chris+Norman.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Chris+Norman.gif

The file File:Chris+Norman.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:32, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chris+Norman.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chris+Norman.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]