User talk:Bcharles

Welcome!

Hello, Bcharles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Jkelly 03:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Natural units

Thanks for your edit to Natural units. It's a good edit that should stick, I think. All I want to point out is that it is a substantive edit, not a minor edit. (You didn't change the whole article, but you did add content. No one should complain, but if there was some editor that, for some reason, did object to adding μ₀ or ε₀, the might not consider that a minor edit.) Minor edits are fixing spelling, grammer, formatting, etc. 72.92.135.195 (talk) 18:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:18, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Devine Mr. J - premiere poster 1974.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Devine Mr. J - premiere poster 1974.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:45, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed.

Orphaned non-free image File:The Thorn - VHS cover c.1984.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Thorn - VHS cover c.1984.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:45, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed.

Imagine (song)

Hello,

You removed the redundant mention of Bill Clinton singing the song, but I can't find the other mention of it. Where in the article is it? Hotcop2 (talk) 00:28, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I see it. Hotcop2 (talk) 00:53, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Non-sovereign territories templates

Non-sovereign territories templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nightw 09:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tibet

Hi Bcharles. I wanted to let you know that I reverted your change to Category:Tibet. You had removed the Category:Autonomous regions of the People's Republic of China and therefore made it an uncategorized category which should really be avoided. I'm guessing that you removed the existing categorization because you think it's incorrect from a political standpoint. I agree that Tibet should probably be differentiated from the Tibet Autonomous Region but for categorization purposes, it's helpful to somewhat blur the distinction. In any case, if you want to change the categorization structure, you should replace it with something more meaningful and possibly do so in collaboration with other editors since this is a controversial subject. Best, Pichpich (talk) 18:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mixed radix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tridecimal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

fixed. Bcharles (talk) 12:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re: Centoctgesimal et al.

You nominated Centoctgesimal and a couple other redirects for speedy-deletion. Unfortunately, that had to be declined. CSD criterion R3 is restricted to redirects which are "newly created" - that is, in the last few minutes or hours. These are several years old and have to be debated at RfD. I've drafted a courtesy nomination for their deletion. I thought about copying in the edit summary you used when applying the CSD tag but didn't think that would do it justice. When you have a minute, please join the deletion debate. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 20:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Added comment. (Re)nominated Centaoctagesimal on Rfd. Bcharles (talk) 21:09, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

why merge base 32 into binary ? jjbernardiscool (talk) 15:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the beer mate. I have copied and replied to your question here. Bcharles (talk) 16:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Astatine

Please stop changing astatine. The Talkpage concluded different. At least a bitstrange you did not visit the talkpage before about this. -DePiep (talk) 17:00, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied and replied to your comment here. I have addressed the issue of At and Po here. Bcharles (talk) 19:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements/Archive 15 for discussions on the status of Po and At (decided: Po = poor metal, At = metalloid). Double sharp (talk) 05:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

detailed response (Po, At, E117)

Because here I can talk about them at greater length and have it not be buried under masses of discussion. :-)

Polonium

See Sandbh's comment here. I'll summarize briefly. (Note: all these properties are listed in the literature, so I would not call it OR.)

The nonmetallic properties just fail to convince me. Polonium forms anionic polonides (but gold forms aurides and also has plenty of nonmetallic properties, such as its very high electronegativity of 2.54, despite being king of metals!) Its halides are easily hydrolyzed, but so are those of many of the poor metals. Its hydride is volatile and unstable, but the same is true of the hydrides of Tl, Pb, and Bi.

The intermediate (metalloidish?) properties are more convincing: coordination number 6; electronegativity of 2.0; ionisation energy of 818 kJ.

But what is most convincing are the metallic properties. It conducts electricity like a normal metal; both its allotropes have a metallic band structure; its enthalpy of fusion is average for closely packed metals; it is soluble in acids, forming Po²⁺ and displacing H; Po has many ionic salts; PoO₂ is mostly basic and has the fluorite structure, typical of ionic metal oxides. And finally, it doesn't even have any nonmetallic allotropes known. Based on this, I cannot see any logical reason to call Po a metalloid. It is clearly a metal based on the vast majority of its properties.

Astatine

This is considerably more speculative given At's short half-life, but nevertheless we do have some info; see Metalloids#Astatine. Astatine's heat of vaporization is 54.39 kJ•mol⁻¹, and elements with this value over 42 kJ•mol⁻¹ are metallic in the liquid state. Like most metals, it precipitates even from strongly acidic solutions with the help of H₂S, and is deposited on the cathode upon electrolysis. It exhibits typical heavy metal behaviour in forming pseudohalides, cationic astatine complexes, complex At(III) anions, and forms complexes with many organic solvents. And the At⁺ and AtO⁺ cations are stable in strongly acidic aqueous solution. It is even predicted to have a metallic appearance when solid! At also seems to be more similar to Po than with the halogens.

OTOH, it has a narrow liquid range like most nonmetals; it has a small band gap like most nonmetals; aqueous astatine chemistry is generally dominated by astatine anions; astatides, astates, and interhalogens where astatine is in the +1 state behave like the corresponding compounds of its lighter congener iodine.

This is a closer call, and hence I would deem it a metalloid. A difficulty with your version is that "Evidence for (or against) the existence of diatomic astatine (At₂) is sparse and inconclusive." (Astatine#Physical) So I would be highly uncomfortable with labelling it specifically as a diatomic nonmetal on our periodic table templates! I only do that with E171 because I have no choice there (no experimental evidence) and it's predicted to behave like the halogens (presumably here referring to F, Cl, Br, and I); given its electron affinity of 3.0 eV, just below iodine's, it should form (171)₂ molecules, whilst most definitely showing incipient metallic properties like I.

Element 117

(I am decidedly not going to call it "ununseptium". Who does in real science?)

First of all, while you are right that it is little understood and that there have been no chemical investigations of it as yet, we only label it as being predicted to be a metalloid. Here's what the most comprehensive source (Fricke 1971) states: "An interesting question is whether element E117 which is in the chemical group of the halogens would form the -1 anion. Cunningham predicted a electron affinity of 2.6 eV whereas the calculations of Waber, Cromer and Liberman calculated a value of only 1.8 eV. Cunningham describes the solid element E117 to have a semi-metallic appearance. It should form stable oxyions of the (III), (V), and (VII) states and stable interhalogen compounds. Because of the small electron affinity it might not exhibit the -1 oxidation state, which is even further suggested by the smaller value calculated by Waber et al. Certainly it will be a very soft base compared with flouride [sic] or chloride which have a electron affinity of 4 eV resp. 3 eV." Its liquid range should also be somewhat larger than astatine's.

So its −1 state would be unstable. If we take the higher EA value, it is defensibly a metalloid. If we take the lower EA value, it is probably a metal (that value is even less than polonium's!) But the stable interhalogen compounds and it being very weakly basic would classify it as a metalloid in my opinion, though I think the case could even be made for it being a metal.

It is important to note that the whole of the above three paragraphs on element 117 is composed of predictions. That is why we give it the muted "metalloid" fill colour. (Though it seems to be not muted enough for you; do you have any suggestions to improve it, if it was the reason why you seemed to me to think (and did you?) that we were colouring it as being certainly a metalloid?) Double sharp (talk) 14:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council

Please visit the talk page Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council. ~ A n w a r a j Urdu: انوراج ‎ 18:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

merging Oktavist and Basso_profondo

I think it's time to pull the trigger on this. Just letting some people know I'll probably merge these soon. Aaron Bruce (talk) 20:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will move ahead with this merge as discussed here.Bcharles (talk) 12:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit you made

Hey there,

I was wondering why you removed this redirect? I didn't quite understand that edit, so I undid it. Did you have a specific reason to do so, if so please reply below. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 00:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skyllfully. I removed the redirect because it is a common and distinct name. I was looking for a notable "Kristen Olson". I am not prepared to create a new page, but others may want to. It may be worth creating a disambiguation page with several Kristen Olsons that are mentioned in other articles, Kirsten, and a Kristen Olsen as well. Bcharles (talk) 15:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Green Primaries/Caucuses

Hi, thanks for getting in touch regarding the Mountain Party's caucus. How it was described to me was also confusing. Here is a link to a conversation that I had with with someone from the state level https://www.facebook.com/groups/34077835814/permalink/10154275298625815/

--Gri3720 (talk) 19:29, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gri3720: From that conversation, regarding how delegates are instructed, "If it is after our convention (July 16th) the convention will dictate. If it before they are free to vote how they see fit." As the national convention is on August 6, that means that the WV convention will instruct their delegates to the national convention. This indicates that a presidential preference vote will be held at the state convention. Bcharles (talk) 02:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States presidential election, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Steinberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed (a while back). Bcharles (talk) 20:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for McMullen map

Bcharles, in the file history for the Evan McMullin map, you gave the following edit comment: "Removing anticipated states; keeping CA per GreenPapers, and WA per SoS." Could you clarify what GreenPapers and SoS are, and perhaps give the links to them? Footnotes aren't needed for the map itself, but without source information we can't list CA and WA in the Evan McMullin presidential campaign, 2016 article -- so at this point, the article shows CA and WA on the map but doesn't list them in the text within the Ballot status section. Thanks! — Lawrence King ^(talk) 19:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lawrence King: I updated states and refs on the McMullin campaign page. The United States presidential election, 2016 page has frequently updated states and refs. TheGreenPapers.com is an elections info site and SoS refers to Secretary of State. Bcharles (talk) 19:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! — Lawrence King ^(talk) 18:30, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:American Delta Party logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:American Delta Party logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Corrected license. Bcharles (talk) 07:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

MB298 (talk) 19:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite. I have a few articles in mind to expand, that fit the challenge. But this month, I think is an Asia focus. I have some articles to revisit there. Bcharles (talk) 12:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bcharles. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Wikiproject!

Hello, Bcharles! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Removal of unsourced material

The pages had been tagged - for years as needed citations, hence why I finally removed the uncited content. Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SMILE!

Hello Bcharles, Me-123567-Me has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Help design a new feature to stop harassing emails

Hi there,

The Anti-Harassment Tools team plans to start develop of a new feature to allow users to restrict emails from new accounts. This feature will allow an individual user to stop harassing emails from coming through the Special:EmailUser system from abusive sockpuppeting accounts.

We’re inviting you to join the discussion because you voted or commented in the 2016 Community Wishlist discussion or IdeaLab discussion about letting users restrict who can send them email.

You can leave comments on this discussion page or send an email to the Anti-Harassment Tools team.

It is important to hear from a broad range of people who are interested in the design of the tool, so we hope you join the discussion.

For the Anti-Harassment Tools team SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 21:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bcharles. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bcharles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Independent Party of Florida

Hello, Bcharles,

Thank you for creating Independent Party of Florida.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on the Independent Party of Florida. Please consider expanding the article in the future if they receive new coverage.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:16, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'd like to hear your opinion on this poll

Poll: 102,000,000 or 1.02 million Thanks! Feelthhis (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

Did you ever figure out how to do what you asked about here? There was a response, but I never saw if it worked for you, and I certainly wouldn't know how to answer you. WP:VPT might be the place.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:35, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vchimpanzee (talk · contribs), Yes the suggestion to use parameters as variables worked, though someone else implemented the change before i got to it, and did so more eloquently than i would have. You can see it in practice here (you will need to view /core to see the calculations behind the template). Bcharles (talk) 01:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on racial hereditarianism at the R&I talk-page

An RfC at Talk:Race and intelligence revisits the question, considered last year at WP:FTN, of whether or not the theory that a genetic link exists between race and intelligence is a fringe theory. This RfC supercedes the recent RfC on this topic at WP:RSN that was closed as improperly formulated.

Your participation is welcome. Thank you. NightHeron (talk) 22:05, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Senary

Template:Senary has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Radix economy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radix economy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radix economy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also sections