User talk:Bcamp09

Comment on summary

Hey - quick comment for you. When you put an Edit Summary in, the text in the /* */ designates which section you just edited. So if you don't mind, it'd be great if instead of doing /* Concourse A - Chautauqua and Piedmont flights to Indy operate Saturdays) */ you left the text in the /* */ alone and did "/* Concourse A */ Chautauqua and Piedmont flights to Indy operate Saturdays" instead. That will make the "→" link to the correct section. Cheers! --Matt 21:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just getting started...

I see now. I'm new to wikipedia, sorry about those errors. Thanks for pointing that out. Bcamp09 22:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good - I appreciate you using the edit summary at all! --Matt 22:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BA

Hey man - what's a "BA"? --Matt (talk) 20:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A badass. I was talking about Taj, not you. Haha Bcamp09 (talk) 20:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I thought - on both counts :D --Matt (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not against a historical information section, but I don't think we need to list out the full gate info and destinations. It's been discussed before that in prose form (with context of the notability) historical airlines and important destinations. I think it'd be really interesting with the growth and decline of PIT. But historical gate usage broken down by airline might be a bit much. Want to talk about it on the article talk page? --Matt (talk) 20:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look I don't want to be a Badass, so I changed it and tell me what you thinkTajtheman (talk) 21:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All you did was move it further up in the article. Anyways, the info you have there is not even accurate or spelled correctly. The point that Matt is making is that if we want to incorporate that kind of stuff in an article, we should for one not include gate numbers, because those always changed and is difficult to verify. Also as Matt said, we should continue this discussion on the talk page of the PIT article. Bcamp09 (talk) 22:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 22:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

southwest

What kind of renovations for southwest A1, A3 and A5. Steelcity95 (talk) 00:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are putting in the new gate areas for the new boarding process. New flat screen monitors, new seating, kids play area behind the customer service podium, 2 big flat screens hanging from the cieling for tv service, larger chairs with plug ins, bar like stands near the outer areas of the lounges so you can stand there and plug in your laptops or other electronics. luketenley —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luketenley (talk • contribs) 04:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DL mainline PIT-DTW, PIT-MSP

Hmmm...i just check their online schedules and these flights end April 5 and will be all Delta Connection beyond April 5. Also, tried to book it for June and shows all Delta Connection unless these will be Saturday only services. Snoozlepet (talk) 08:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you check out the downloadable timetables and search any date in late April, you will see 6x daily PIT-DTW on DC-9's and an A319 scheduled to MSP. Bcamp09 (talk) 14:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, i see it now. The mainline service is there until June 9 when it goes al Delta Connection. Snoozlepet (talk) 04:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]