Hello Bbx118! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! User:Chongkian (talk) 07:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the WWE Championship belt design until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nickag989talk19:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Hello, Bbx118. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, John Saxon (wrestler), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please stop adding invalid entries to the list of proposed state mergers. The lsit is meant for proper proposals by the powers that can enact them, "proposals originating from sovereign states or organizations". Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 10:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
See comment on your page.Bbx118 (talk) 11:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Until there is agreement between the governments of both sides and a proposal is drafted and tabled and approved to that effect, it is not a proposed state merger. If you add it again, it will simply be removed again. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 11:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Bbx118. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Bbx118: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 14:05, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Lee Vilenski. Bbx118, thanks for creating Kiera Hogan!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs more sources to prove it passes WP:GNG. Cagematch doesn't add towards GNG.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EIRSAT-1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
devon retired the same night he was put through the table by the Club if you watch wwe 24 Dudley’s you’d know this, that’s why he’s semi retired cause sometimes he wrestles, and sportskeda is not a reliable source I suggest you go to the pro wrestling wiki and look over the reliable and unreliable sources, feel free to leave a message on my talk page TheKinkdomMan (talk) 22:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 22:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:NWA logo as of 2018.tiff. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading File:NWA logo as of 2018.tiff. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Hamilton (announcer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 13:38, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you revert back Twitter is not a source we use on Wikipedia, it’s social media which you put in the external links not in the article itself TheKinkdomMantalk21:17, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi; Twitter generally isn't a valid source unless it is primary information about the subject. See here for more info, and feel free to edit my addition. BBX118 21:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
The Blaze and The Daily Caller are partisan right-wing sources unacceptable for claims about living people, and the CNN article you cite contains no trace of the claimed statement. Do not reinsert the disputed material absent consensus on the talk page; it is your responsibility to gain consensus for the inclusion of this material, particularly given the questionable-at-best sourcing and the anonymous nature of the purported source. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's incorrect; the CNN source clearly states what is cited. Alas, I was simply adding additional information to a subject I had been reading about. You seem to have a clear bias on the subject and as I have no dog in the fight, so to speak, I shall end the discussion here. Regards - BBX118 17:37, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nazi Party. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
I noticed your recent edit to C. S. Lewis does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:29, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mario Andretti is an Italian with US citizenship, so he gets called American. I believe someone with Japanese citizenship would likewise be considered Japanese, especially considering how difficult it is for a gaijin to obtain. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 16:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Your recent editing history at Cisgender shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Canterbury Tailtalk13:34, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Bbx118. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
There exist zero reason to remove that he's American form the lead, to leave it out is straight up inacurate. Please stop doing that, I have no idea why you think it's a good idea to do that but its not. The lead section summarieses the article which means saying "already covered below" is a very poor argument. And since Hart says he consideres himself to be equally Canadian and American and has lived and voted in America many years of his life it's rather insulting to try to remove that he's American from the lead.★Trekker (talk) 15:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The issue was you were removing an entire edit, which included up-to-date information. You should have edited the opening separately, which has now been rectified.BBX118 17:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
The information was on the wrong page; events go to their own page.BBX118 21:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Please use edit summaries in the future. All I see is 100,000 bytes of content being removed and no edit summary. Your edit was fine though so striking the warning. StaticVapormessage me!22:24, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magomed Magomedkerimov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CASSIOPEIA(talk)06:10, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hey bro i have a question, what about another wrestlers who appear in NWA Powerrr tv tapings like Dan Parker, Tad Parker, Jordan Kingsley, Danny White, Mims and Brooklyn Creed, look at this https://www.cagematch.net//?id=8&nr=9&page=8, so this wrestlers aren't part of NWA Roster? thanks.
-- Hi FranX, thanks for info and source! I'll add them. The roster page was created before Powerrr aired so there'll be some personnel who haven't been updated as of yet. BBX118 19:48, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
So, I don't Know if this wrestlers are a part of NWA Roster or only maybe a "jobbers" invited like a guest?
-- (FranXBSC|talk) 10:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC-5)
Hello, I'm STATicVapor. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Dezmond Xavier. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.
In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! StaticVapormessage me!23:41, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Jocephus (wrestler), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk)03:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I’m a fan of Howard finkel and I’m looking to write a school report on him. I saw that you were the last to make an edit to the wiki page about him and I’d like to know how you found out your information.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeyrickyboby (talk • contribs) 06:24, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Howard is retired due to health but he's still under contract with WWE, likely due to his long service with the company. BBX118 15:39, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello again. I was wondering if you could offer any advice for my first article? I took a stab at writing an article about George Cannon's "Superstars of Wrestling" program which nationally syndicated in Canada (and parts of the U.S.) during the 1970s. The article is posted here on Wikipedia:Sandbox. I'm not the best writer but I think the sources are solid. Are there any members at the Pro Wrestling WikiProject that would be willing to look it over? 173.162.220.17 (talk) 18:41, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
while Japan was certainly not involved in any way with the holocaust - Italy was. It sent people to German-run camps, even though Italians didn't actually run any such camps themselves. Hence Primo Levi's time at Auschwitz. Plus soldiery from eastern European collaborationist states were actively engaged in running camps - it was mainly them I was thinking of - does one count collaborationist states or puppet regimes as 'allies'? I thought yes. Pincrete (talk) 15:55, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrett Brown (wrestler) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sismarinho (talk) 05:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. USA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
As is the SDLP article, "along with other pages relating to The Troubles, Irish Nationalism and British Nationalism in relation to Ireland". FDW777 (talk) 19:24, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If someone undoes your edit, do not undo that revision as you did on the page: Nikki Haley. What's worse is that you didn't even spell it correctly, which was the initial reason for the undoing of your edit. Dr. Blazer (talk) 20:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if you saw but I reverted your addition of titles in the 'Award and honors' section. I thought it was in MOS:BOXING that they should be in a section of their own, but I was wrong. An example of what I meant would be this section in Mayweather's article. Besides that, my reasoning to keep them separate would be that titles aren't really awarded like "The Ring Fighter of the Year", titles are won. – 2.O.Boxing17:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jocephus (wrestler), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Hello, Bbx118. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jocephus".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.
The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.
The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
I'm just flagging this up again, Bbx118, because there appears to still be a problem with your signature. Per policy, your signature needs to include at least one direct link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page, but the link included here doesn't - what looks like a link goes to the wrong page, because of the capitalisation of the letters BBX. Would you be able to fix this? Cordless Larry (talk) 21:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes sir I've correct it now (hopefully), thanks for letting me know!
I'm writing to you because you are listed as a member of the Wikiproject Pro Wrestling, and I'm in need of third (actually fourth) opinions.
The thing is, Hartley Jackson recently went through an AfD that arose a lengthy of discussion.
I will try to summarize the problem below.
Jammo85 had asked me for assistance in find sources to a certain fact, and I did find some good sources, but we are still facing opposition from another user in Hartley Jackson and The Mighty Don't Kneel (TMDK). I would thus like to ask your opinion on the matter.
We would like to state "Hartley Jackson was part of The Mighty Don't Kneel in 2015 and 2016."
I have found two sources from websites of official pro wrestling events (they are archived, please give it a few minutes to load):
but this website is listed in one unofficial list of reliable sources as being Marginally reliable. Strictly used for match results and not other information. Takes user submissions but is reviewed by regional editors that verify all submissions before they are added to the database. The other party uses this against us, but I actually think it supports us, as we are actually only using results here. That is, we are not using the blog posts produced in cagematch (see [6]).
I thought the above sources were enough, but there are some more if you would like to see:[1][2][3].
^Wrestle rampage's official ad on social media [1].
^Other sources on this piece of information are: [2], which is an article from a podcast on wrestling, which mentions Hartley as being part of TMDK; and also [3][4], which are official match advertisements from Wrestling Rampage, and show Hartley in the TMDK team. All links were accessed on October 7, 2020.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Basically it means that we'll be a bit stricter in enforcing policy and that some pages may have specific restrictions on them - those will be seen at the top of the talk page and at times at the top of the edit field. In one area we don't allow IPs or new accounts to edit, but that's the Arab-Israeli conflict area. It's standard, I have them at the top of my talk page. Doug Wellertalk15:54, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, apologies for not getting back sooner, thanks for your answer! I don't recall editing any post-1932 US political article but I know IP addresses can be confused/shared etc. Thanks for getting back! BBX118 19:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
I am not removing information about Dain's nationality. I am changing his nationality to match what's in his Twitter bio and the rest of the article. You're the one claiming he self-identifies as proper Irish, therefore the onus is on you to prove something that isn't mentioned in the reference. If you can't find any better reference claiming he's actually Irish, you're going to leave it as Northern Irish. It really is that simple. Afreoleidddra (talk) 09:31, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're removing information. Please take it to the talk page of the article or I'll have to report this. Thanks.
PS: Your message ("proper Irish", "actually Irish") is telling.
Also - he literally has an Irish tricolour as his profile photo.
BBX118 10:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
You're the only reason I need to bring it up at all, I'll put whatever you like in the talk page seeing as you asked but quite frankly you're the only one that's causing a problem here. I'm not removing information. I'm changing it to match what's in the source. Find me any credible source in which he describes himself as being from the Republic of Ireland, not Northern Ireland, and I'll leave the matter be. His bio has him as being from Northern Ireland, the article says he was born in Belfast and describes Finlay as his "fellow countryman" - why would it if Dain was Irish as you claim? I really don't see what's so unreasonable about calling him Northern Irish. You're the one that's making claims that contradicts the source and the rest of the article. I really don't know how many different ways I can say that before I end up repeating myself but it's very telling that I even have to at all. Afreoleidddra (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
From what you've written it's clear you don't understand the subject here re: Irish identify. One does not have to be from the Republic of Ireland to be Irish; Irish nationality law applies to the island, not the state, and the Good Friday Agreement guarantees everyone in Norther Ireland the right to identify and be accepted as Irish or British or both. His twitter account has a photo of him with an Irish tricolour; it previously said Irish in the intro until he left WWE and replaced the entire intro, hence the twitter link. I'm not sure why this is such a passionate area for you, but as I said, the talk page is the right place for putting forward a case why it should be removed. I'm sure we both want what's best for the article. Thanks.
PS: His Instagram might be a worthwhile source on this as he identifies himself as an "Irish pro wrestler" in his bio.
https://www.instagram.com/damomackle/
BBX118 22:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
For the same reason you're "pro-life", I should imagine. Sometimes we just like to pretend we're entitled an opinion on other people's lives which affect us in no way whatsoever. You're welcome. Afreoleidddra (talk) 06:50, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to have to advise you against personal insults here. I'm always happy to discuss articles, but if you continue to bring personal attacks to the page I'm going to have to escalate this. Thanks.
BBX118 09:39, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
I wasn't trying to insult you, I was just trying to find some common ground between us. If you're choosing to take a reference to the fact you're anti-abortion as an insult, then maybe it's time to wonder why. I'll get onto the talk page now. Thank you for your cooperation on the matter. Afreoleidddra (talk) 11:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! ClaudineChionh (talk) 00:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for uploading File:Baron Michele Leone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
You cannot use a fair use image for an article if a free alternative is available. Per Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, "No free equivalent. Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." This is the case as Baron Michele Leone as the infobox image is to illustrate what he looked like. The free version does that and does not infringe on the creator's copyright. Thanks. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Twitter, Inc.. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. I literally couldn't care less about WP:DTTR, you're pushing a weird POV and no one likes that.LilianaUwU(talk / contributions)22:01, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not insert unclear, uncited, possibly untrue statements into articles. Especially do not repeat exactly the same action after you have been reverted; if you insist that masala is Scottish, try bringing it up on the talk page and get a consensus to add that statement. Happy days, ~ LindsayHello18:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bbx118, claiming that the dish is scottish, british, indian, bangladeshi etc has upset people in the past. We have no solid proof of who devised it, where. There's a section in the article that lists some of the many theories regarding its origin. Stating that it appeared in UK curry restaurants is hard to dispute, but claiming it for one specific nation is neither proved nor conducive to harmonious collaboration. Best wishes, Guffydrawers (talk)
Hello Bbx118, We just don't know if CTM originated in Scotland, which is why there is a large section in the article on theories of its provenance. Consensus is that a GB origin is extremely likely, but which side of the border is not proven. If such proof is available, please add it to the article. Regards Guffydrawers (talk)
Question. Why did you remove this note with the incorrect claim that it's erroneous? It is well referenced that Keilty identifies as both Irish and Northern Irish plus a bit of British. Why would we cherry pick and declare him to be a single national identity when he hasn't declared he considers himself that. At no point has he said "I'm Irish and not the other things". As you know, people from Northern Ireland can choose how they wish to identify and he's chosen Irish and Northern Irish with a bit of British. Canterbury Tailtalk14:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:National Wrestling Alliance logo 2019.png
Thanks for uploading File:National Wrestling Alliance logo 2019.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. — Newslingertalk06:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit to Ethnic groups in Europe has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yup I've reverted it as sources suggest the exact same thing. Irish names must be referenced and must be in use. No evidence this is used for the original organisation and current one in Northern Ireland. Canterbury Tailtalk13:59, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
or 
) located above the edit window.
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Greg Hamilton (announcer), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 03:06, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:29, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. — Newslinger talk 06:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Your edit to Ethnic groups in Europe has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
