User talk:Bbutlerministries
|
Duplicate images uploaded
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Princess07.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Colbymyspacepic.jpg. The copy called Image:Colbymyspacepic.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 16:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Jrteen05.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Jrteen05.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Miss Christian International, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight 0001 03:58, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Block
[edit]The autoblock has been removed. Please follow our policies and procedures. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 18:26, 5 May 2007 (UTC)