User talk:Bbfoxy

Your recent editing history at Sam Harris shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thank you very much for your consideration of Wikipedia policies. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 21:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Don't be intimidated by these warning templates !

Anyone can place one, however as long as your edits are all done in good faith and properly announced on Talk page, and as far as I can detect they are, you have nothing to be afraid of - especially when you receive one of these from an biased editor, whose User page clearly shows he is Harris' aficionado. But continue to be careful, as you are careful and quite polite regarding editing on Harris, at least. I also want to express my agreement with you on the issue of Harris.--Santasa99 (talk) 03:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)