User talk:Bbc richardb
The article Chew lips has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 09:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Chew lips requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ∗ \ / (⁂) 10:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Chew lips
[edit]I have nominated Chew lips, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chew lips. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MBisanz talk 05:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey. To be honest I don't know why this article has been nominated for deletion under notability guidelines but it does need a rewrite. Any objections to me giving it an overhaul? You can respond on my talk page or here, either will do Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- I gave the article a rewrite feel free to add more info if you like :) Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I'm sort of a newbie of a member and I tried to start my own article on Daley (Musician) - but if its okay with you all, I want to perhaps add on to the article? I recently got a hold Daley himself with some info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexappacman (talk • contribs) 04:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Alan Pownall for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Pownall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Pownall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:01, 15 April 2014 (UTC)