User talk:Bb5757

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kshatriya has been reverted. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.Rajkris (talk) 21:47, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Arora, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sikh-History 13:23, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Remove References

Do not remove validly cited references as you have at article Arora. You will notice one editor has already been permenantly blocked because of this behaviour. Please do not get blocked becausee of this. Thanks --Sikh-History 14:08, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Arora. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sikh-History 18:29, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Arora, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sikh-History 17:26, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Arora, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 07:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out sourced content and replace it with your own opinion, as you did at Arora, you may be blocked from editing. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 15:11, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove sourced content and replace it with your own opinion, as you did at Arora,you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Arora. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 09:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Arora

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out sourced content and replace it with unsourced content, as you did at Arora, you may be blocked from editing. You may with to consider discussing your edits on the talk page of the article, or you could post a message here. I urge you to discuss your edits or stop your behavior, or you could soon be facing another block. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 16:42, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content from Wikipedia, as you did at Arora, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 20:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Arora. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Minima c (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bb5757, please be aware of the report about your edit-warring at WP:AN3#Bb5757 reported by User:Diannaa (Result: 48h). You are lucky to receive only a 48-hour block for these actions. If you continue to edit in the same style after the block expires, reverting the Arora article to your own version and never discussing anything with others, it is likely that you will be permanently blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

reply bu bb5757i have been blocked despite presenting the true and correct facts fegarding arira this is unfair on part of the administrators they are follwing in the path of an unscrupoulos and fixated uk based editor who dosent know the facts of the arora community kindly unblock me and verify the facts before blocking my edit this is not a warring buyt a correction of the facts as stated

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for continuing your disruptive removal of sourced contents, edit warring on Arora. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 13:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended because of suckpuppetry

Since you have chosen to evade your block and continue your edit warring on the Arora article using the sockpuppet Vs2325 (talk · contribs), I have reset your block to run for two weeks from today. Favonian (talk) 13:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

This is your only warning. If you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Arora, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 16:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]