User talk:Baudimoovan

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of banned films have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of banned films was changed by Baudimoovan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947869 on 2021-01-23T11:21:51+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Soul (2020 film), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 03:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Borat. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 04:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jason Drucker. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Denniss (talk) 09:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Borat Subsequent Moviefilm. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 22:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at Mikhail Gorbachev, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 331dot (talk) 09:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gorbachev is not dead what about that do you not understand Baudimoovan (talk) 09:59, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, then you will need to offer your reliable sources with that information and inform world leaders and the worldwide media about that. You can certainly believe what you wish, but here content is based on what reliable sources say. In any event, you are now blocked for your vulgar and disruptive postings. To request to be unblocked, please follow the instructions above. 331dot (talk) 10:05, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

look, i am very sorry for insulting you and vandalizing the page i hope you understand sometimes it is difficult to accept that someone you admire is dead so i am very sorry for not taking his death well, he freed my country he did so much for the world but sometimes good people pass away i hope i learn my lesson for my insults and vandalism and i hope you accept my apology. regards baudimoovan Baudimoovan (talk) 10:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your apology; I will remove the block. I might suggest that being on Wikipedia while in a time of grief may not be the best thing to do. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. Baudimoovan (talk) 10:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DanCherek (talk) 12:49, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, dear dan cherek i was stunned to hear that i was banned from wikipedia indefinietly but i'd like to mention that my Computer was recently stolen from a coffee shop and this was someone else i know this sounds like b.s but it's true i checked the edit which resulted in the block and i was surprised at the racism and vulgarity that this "user" added to the article. may have been blocked in the past but it was removed shortly thereafter but i guess im responsible for my accounts and stuff so on the behalf of the individual who stole my laptop and vandalized the article i apologize i know this probably wont get me anywhere but i guess an apology is an apology. Regards baudimoovan. Baudimoovan (talk) 13:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the end then i guess this is the end i hope my contributions on Wikipedia have either helped or convinienced someone in the world but now because of someone else i have to lose my wikipedia account i guess this is it after almost two years could possibly be the "very end" Baudimoovan (talk) 13:07, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dancherek i hope you understand i would never make offensive remarks on wikipedia as a Democrat and Jew i found the edits made on my account extremely offensive i can't believe anyone in the world would do such as a thing post a picture of the most evil man on earth make fun of the president insult democrats and post a picture of a woman's genitals that just sound stupid why would anyone do that. im absolutely disgusted at this person's point of view they should try growing up! Baudimoovan (talk) 13:25, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dancherek please respond i understand i was blocked in the past for vandalism but this time it wasn't me so please have some mercy on me i understand im kinda responsible for this incident because i didn't delete my accounts when my laptop was stolen but still. this is unfair Baudimoovan (talk) 13:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i understand this sounds like a bunch of excuses but please reconsider dancherek Baudimoovan (talk) 13:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a believable explanation to me, and even if it was true, accounts that are actively compromised cannot be unblocked due to security reasons. Your best shot at getting unblocked is to own up and convince an administrator that the block will not be necessary going forward. I do not plan to unblock at this time; for further consideration, please use the {{unblock}} template as described in the block notice above. DanCherek (talk) 13:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fine dancherek i guess this is it it's my fault for letting my computer get in the wrong hands i don't know how you want me to own up to something i did not do but i'll surely try. Baudimoovan (talk) 13:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it's sad to see that there are still bigots in this world am i right? Baudimoovan (talk) 14:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

tbh im kinda happy you blocked the account one less a-hole in the world but what about me i hope they'll let me make a new account because now because of a racist douche im blocked Baudimoovan (talk) 14:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a new account, or editing while logged out, will be considered block evasion. DanCherek (talk) 14:05, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

im not conspiring to do block evasion, all im saying is i hope they'll make a new account because the laptop has my old one. and im betting you still think i did this Baudimoovan (talk) 14:07, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The effects of "Cancel Culture" at full effects Baudimoovan (talk) 14:08, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

also i just wanna ask according to you how do you own up to something you didn't do? Baudimoovan (talk) 14:12, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i don't know why you gotta be so mean Baudimoovan (talk) 14:18, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i know you cant help me but still Baudimoovan (talk) 14:18, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you remind me of my mother in law dancherek, just blunt about everything unlikeable unforgiving and for most just straight up thought everything that came out of my mouth was a big chunk of b.s like i told her i was the perfect guy for her daughter she didn't believe it she thought i stole her money and she still thinks that to this day so yeah quite the resembelence right? you're polish right? i assume. she was also polish. not trying to be offensive but poles have quite the tendecy to not believe people. Baudimoovan (talk) 14:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 14:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #64989

is closed. Referred to CU's and T&S for the sake of thoroughness. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To me, the vandal looks like the original account holder. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And like the appellant. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]