User talk:Batwoman90210

May 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Jonathan Rosenthal, from its old location at User:Batwoman90210/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 15:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Rosenthal (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Using Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Same_reference_used_more_than_once would show there aren't as numerous sources as it may seem; also, please, after using the link listed earlier in my comment, please add all additional amounts of in-depth third-party news sources overall; No press releases, trivial passing mentions, social media links or interviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Rosenthal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jonathan Rosenthal has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonathan Rosenthal. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 21:35, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jonathan Rosenthal has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonathan Rosenthal. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Rosenthal (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Declined boldly for now due to markup and tone issues. The principal author has not edited in a month, and there is no need to leave this pending review forever. If the principal author returns to editing or another editor wants to improve this draft, they can resubmit this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Rosenthal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jonathan Rosenthal

Hello, Batwoman90210. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jonathan Rosenthal".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 05:48, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Periscape (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by K.e.coffman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Periscape and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Periscape, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 03:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Periscape concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Periscape, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. — Freoh 00:54, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can I report malicious and dangerous edits to senior Wikipedia staff? A friend working at a high-level about to escalate a page to a higher lock. Since 12/28 when he was hospitalized, the page has allowed false and dangerous accessions to be entered. Please advise. Thank you. Batwoman90210 (talk) 21:20, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The typical procedure for stopping problematic edits is to follow the BRD cycle. If you have a problem with recent changes, you can revert to a stable version and discuss your concerns on the talk page. Which edits do you find dangerous? There are separate procedures for true emergencies. — Freoh 21:32, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]