User talk:Battybri

Re: Cyril Ramaphosa

I'm not sure just removing content, and claiming that it/it's addition is "malicious" is appropriate. At least not without sources. Boomer Vial^{Happy Holidays! • Contribs} 01:06, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message - there was a user Fenna007 (now does not exist) on the page who added all the content I removed to the 'Controversies' section. I believe this to be an act of vandalism on the page - as they were citing compromised sources of information such as the WMC Leaks site which is a known propaganda tool and creator of fake news for the opposition within the ANC. Exposure of WMC Leaks site Second reference to unsuitable info on WMC leaks site WMC Leaks Screengrabs were quickly taken after the update and circulated on Twitter before they were taken down - where I discovered them. It would appear that the vandals are using Twitter to legitimise the perceived controversy by the opposition. I'd expect more of this to happen over the coming days/weeks as the ANC has its conference.

Example of vandalism of controversy section

Battybri (talk) 08:19, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Derek Joubert

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Derek Joubert, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dereck Joubert moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dereck Joubert. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dereck Joubert (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 48JCL was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dereck Joubert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

48 JCL 12:47, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Battybri! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 48 JCL 12:47, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Battybri! Your additions to AfrikaBurn have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]