User talk:Batteryseparator

Welcome!

Hello, Batteryseparator, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Celgard, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Meph^talk 18:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Celgard

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Celgard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Meph^talk 18:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Celgard Page Speedy Deletion Contest

I work for Celgard, LLC and was instructed by my superiors to post the page. My manager, Holli Hughes, Global Marketing and Communications Manager, is currently drafting an email using your template to extend permission for me to post the data as it is found on the Wikipedia Celgard page. I will be submitting that to your organization shortly.

Stephanie Parker Marketing Coordinator

Batteryseparator (talk) 19:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately in my experience it is scarcely ever worth the time and effort spent on giving such copyright clearance, as the article is almost always deleted for other reasons. Material copied from a company's web site is virtually always far too promotional in character for an encyclopaedia article, so that such articles are deleted for that reason, even if the copyright issue has been dealt with. In addition, since you work for the company, you have a conflict of interest, and should not be writing an article about it. Wikipedia articles need to be written from a neutral, impartial, point of view, and it is almost always impossible for an insider to stand back and see how their own editing will look to an outsider. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:28, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Batteryseparator. You have new messages at Batteryseparator's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I am confused, then, how companies such as Sony, BYD, Coda Automotive, etc have their company pages posted? I find it perplexing that a non-affiliate of their companies would take such time and tedium to produce their pages. Please advise. Thank you.

Other companies like the ones mentioned did not create their own pages. Run of the mill editors did. If the companies did add to the pages, that is a Conflict of Interest and not really acceptable. Maybe they did, and went under the radar. Please read the Business FAQ which will probably answer many of your questions. I do not know why your manager requested you create a page, other that for promotional purposes. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to market your company. -- Alexf^(talk) 19:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]