User talk:Batreweydf

Created the first draft

Just worked on creating the first draft Batreweydf (talk) 18:34, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simplilearn (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simplilearn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Curb Safe Charmer for your inputs, and guiding in the right direction.. I will check / research for the more reliable resources and also re-check the submitted draft before actually submitting it for reivew. Good day! Batreweydf (talk) 03:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Batreweydf! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simplilearn (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The raising of fund is a routine business activity and doesn't contribute to notability. Niche industry awards don't typically contribute to notability unless the award itself merits an article(like Academy Award or nobel Peace Prize). Large parts of the draft are unsourced. Based on this content, I think you have a misunderstanding as to what Wikipedia is for. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about a company and what it does. An article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. "Significant coverage" goes beyond merely telling about the activities of the company and goes into detail about its significance or influence as the source sees it. Please read Your First Article. I am wondering if you have a connection to this company, please see your user talk page for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simplilearn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 12:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello Batreweydf. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Batreweydf. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Batreweydf|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 12:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time and valuable feedback. I wanted to share that I've a particular interest in the EdTech companies, and saw that there have been some pages of the related companies already in the Wikipedia, which also lists the mention of this company in their page, so I got this idea. Also I'm not being paid for working or creating this article.

I just wanted to try, how good it can be to create an article page. So, just kept trying. Also, if it's ok I wanted to update this article based on the correct inputs that are just provided, in order for this to be reviewed again.

Request to please advise and let me know. Batreweydf (talk) 13:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any connection of any kind to this company? 331dot (talk) 13:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No I do not have .. thank you again Batreweydf (talk) 14:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the logo of the company, logos are typically licensed as fair use, and can't be uploaded to Commons(which can only host "free" images) unless you want anyone to be able to alter your logo and do with it as they wish (including commerical purposes) without the permission of what I assume is your company. Non-free images also cannot be in drafts. The draft approval process only considers the text and sources, images can wait until and when the draft is accepted. 331dot (talk) 12:58, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, for the logo could you please share the required guidelines..? I'll check it from my side. Batreweydf (talk) 13:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines are at WP:UPIMAGE. Logos may be uploaded to this local version of Wikipedia, they cannot be on Commons. As I said, logos cannot be in drafts, but once the draft is accepted a logo can be included. 331dot (talk) 13:52, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much.. I'll go through the article and do the required. Batreweydf (talk) 14:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opinion on notability. My edits were copyediting for format stuff. David notMD (talk) 16:13, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Simplilearn

Hello, Batreweydf. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simplilearn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Simplilearn

Hello, Batreweydf. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Simplilearn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]