User talk:Batman2297

Welcome!

Hello, Batman2297, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 04:45, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Minigames of Five Nights at Freddy's

Hello Batman2297,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Minigames of Five Nights at Freddy's for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Roshan014 (talk) 20:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Minigames of Five Nights at Freddy's‎ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minigames of Five Nights at Freddy's‎ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minigames of Five Nights at Freddy's‎ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wani (talk) 18:44, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About FNAF Pages

Look, this isn't the FNAF Wiki. Therefore, we are not supposed to have entire pages about details from the game.

We do not need an entire article about Freddy, we do not need an entire article about a list of minigames from the series, and we certainly do not need an article about the fourth game yet. The one about the list of FNAF characters does have some significance, but that is it.

Please, stop adding entire pages that are only about the game and information from it. We don't make entire articles about every character and detail from Call of Duty, so we don't need to do it for FNAF. If you see an entire article just about one character, it'd be much better if you just added a redirect towards either the article about the game itself or the list of characters instead of making its own page.

EDIT: Please stop continuously adding the page for Freddy Fazbear, despite my constant explanations as to why it is not necessary and my warnings of going to an admin. Creating a page about the character is a violation of numerous rules, and if you continue to re-add the unnecessary information, I will go to an admin.

EDIT #2: This isn't really my place to tell you, but for the sake of simplicity, please stop creating articles about the game unless you get an admin's approval. By creating an article about the entire series, you renamed the first game and screwed it all up, so now we need to think of a new way to fix it because we can't revert it.

So please, in the near future, just don't create any FNAF pages without getting an admin's okay...

Regards,

-Killerwhale24680 (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May I suggest the Five Nights at Freddy's Wiki for detailed content on the game. Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Legends of Tommorow

Please stop moving the page and actually discuss it. Per WP:BRD, you made a bold edit (in this case a page move) and it was undone by 3 (maybe 4) times by 2 (maybe three) editors in the last few days. Also as you do not appear to be replying to our edit summaries within yours, there is a chance that you aren't seeing them. So here are some other examples of pages that are done like this:

Marvel's The Avengers → The Avengers (2012 film)
Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. → Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 15:07, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scott Cawthon

The article Scott Cawthon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:45, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Cawthon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Scott Cawthon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TL22 (talk) 19:37, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Five Nights at Freddy's characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Five Nights at Freddy's characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Five Nights at Freddy's characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 00:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Easter Egg Links

Thank you for your edits at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, however they have been reverted because they contravene WP:EGG. Please review Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking so that you can understand the types of links that are acceptable for Wikipedia. Thanks. DonQuixote (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Adolf Hitler, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 20:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Batman2297 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry about that, this wasn't me, it was one of my friends messing with Donald Trump [[User:Batman2297|I am vengeance...I am the night...I am Batman!]] (talk) 16:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As per Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks#Compromised_accounts, this account is not eligible for unblocking. Yamla (talk) 17:21, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"Events in Five Nights at Freddy's" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Events in Five Nights at Freddy's and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 11#Events in Five Nights at Freddy's until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]