User talk:Batista.501

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Batista.501 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am using this account and only me. For the moment I haven’t done anything on Wikipedia, but I will respect all the comments you have made, as soon as I will start to contribute. Thanks a lot. By the way I work in Brazilian language, bye--Batista.501 (talk) 16:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So, you're not abusing multiple accounts? Interesting. As long as you (or a group of individuals) at Jaeger-LeCoultre continue to create multiple technically indistinguishable accounts for promotion you cannot be unblocked. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:28, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Ponyo,

I invite you to read this investigation [[1]] that is now closed. It will explain you why [[2]] and me (and others) having the same IP adress. That will also gives you many responses. Please feel free to contact [[3]] , the one who was in charge of this investigation. By the way he said he will personaly take care of the unblock.

Below I respond briefly to your points, because maybe you haven’t had the time to read the investigation :

I do not abuse multiple account, because I am brazilian and I will contribute in Brazilian language with my own account. This could not be a meatpuppetry as you said, because I will only take care of the brazilian language, which is an indepedant page from the others. I won’t bring no one with me during the exchange with others contributors.

This is not indistinguishable because I made a transparent introduction of myself by declaring who I am, and what will be my contributions on Wikipedia. Your promotional accusation seems premature, in so far as I haven’t made any contribution on live pages or talk pages yet. Hope the reading of the investigation case will reassure you on this point.

I totally understand the C.O.I issue you and NativeForeigner have raised, thus I will be extremely cautious on all the points you made. Regards,--Batista.501 (talk) 14:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Olá pessoal,

Eu trabalho em uma agência que presta serviços para a Jaeger-LeCoultre e, neste momento, o projeto no qual eu estou trabalhando se concentra em torno das páginas em português na Wikipédia. Acabo de criar minha própria conta na Wikipédia e meu objetivo é contribuir com as páginas em português. A Jaeger-LeCoultre está muito entusiasmada com a página na Wikipédia dedicada à companhia, escrita e moderada por colaboradores como você. Eu gostaria de estreitar relações com todos os colaboradores experientes que trabalharam em artigos sobre a Jaeger-LeCoultre na Wikipedia, bem como, com os entusiastas de relógios em geral. Minha vontade é fazer parte do processo colaborativo do qual vocês participam, para ajudar na consistência dos artigos e também poder compartilhar meus conhecimentos sobre a Jaeger-LeCoultre.

Estou interessado em escrever artigos no Wikipédia em português, e neste sentido, eu estaria disposto a utilizar conteúdo do trabalho colaborativo que já está escrito em inglês.

Depois de ler as instruções em [[4]], especialmente a seção [[5]] e [[6]] eu fiquei ciente de que a contribuição da marca é possível (e apreciada) apenas se eu respeitar a política do site detalhada em [[7]]. O meu foco é trabalhar a partir de sua orientação e compartilhar informações sobre a Jaeger-LeCoultre com vocês.--Batista.501 (talk) 16:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Potential unblock

I am willing to unblock this account as long as you promise to refrain from editing articles related to House of Krug directly, and to provide full disclosure of the connection on your user page, prominently. You must also disclose that you are working in conjunction with users named at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tristan.sbry. You may use the article talk pages to suggest changes, or the {{request edit}} template to request edits. Requested edits are subject to the same editorial standards as any other, and may not be acted upon. Failure to comply with these guidelines will result in you being reblocked. Please use {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}, and in your reason explain that you understand these guidelines, and how you intend to follow through with them. NativeForeigner ^Talk 19:37, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Batista.501 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am using this account and only me. For the moment I haven’t done anything on Wikipedia, but I will respect all the comments you have made, as soon as I will start to contribute on talk pages only as you told me. By the way I work in a digital agency and only on Brazilian language for Jaeger-LeCoultre brand. I share IP with all those members here [[8]] Thanks a lot. --Batista.501 (talk) 16:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your response to Bwilkins below gives me the impression that you still don't totally understand the concept of COI, nor the effect that not understanding the policy can have on corporate articles. I'd advise you to re-read it, then file another request stating that you will not violate the policy and avoid articles (and their talkpages) to which you are heavily tied. — foxj 17:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, some important key things:

You and your colleagues may not edit articles with which you have conflict of interest, such as that brand
You and your colleagues should never be editing the same articles to avoid conflict and the apearance of false wp:Consensus

(✉→BWilkins←✎) 23:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bwilkins,

OK for your first point : as NativeForeigner already mentioned it and as I said in my request: I will only contribute on talk pages. Never edit "on live" on my own. Ok for your second point : I am the only one in the agency mastering Brazilian and the Jaeger-LeCoultre Brand, so I will be and remain the only one editing corresponding talk pages. Thank you, --Batista.501 (talk) 15:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]