User talk:BatMiata

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Itemized deduction, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Itemized deduction was changed by BatMiata (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960711 on 2012-01-29T05:16:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hoochie coochie may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

person as calling a whore a pig reffers to being infected with gonorrhea, syphilis or similiar (see 'pig alley".

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:"The Shaky Bridge" near Trenton Water Filtration Plant.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:"The Shaky Bridge" near Trenton Water Filtration Plant.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 05:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is the nature of the connection between In God We Trust and the Song?

I reverted your edit [1] because there was no source given that said that anyone drew a connection between the song and the motto when either the motto or song were adopted. If you find that information anywhere, please feel free to add the information back. I agree that it can't be a coincidence- it seems like there must be a connection- but we only have one source on wikipedia that says that the two are connected, and it is a piece of journalism which plagiarized an unsourced assertion on wikipedia that the two were connected. I think we need a real source, something academic or from a source from fifty or more years ago that says "hey, this is a great motto that we chose because it is a line from the national anthem". Thanks for your time. Geographyinitiative (talk) 14:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]