User talk:Bass77/Archive 0
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bass77. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
December 2020 Guild of Copy Editors Newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors December 2020 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2020. Current and upcoming events
Election time: our end-of-year Election of Coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before Auld Lang Syne. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. December Blitz: This will run from 13 to 19 December, and will target all Requests. Sign up now. Drive and Blitz reports
September Drive: 67 fewer articles had copy-edit templates by this month's close. Of the 27 editors who signed up, 15 copy-edited at least one article, and 124 articles were claimed for the drive. October Blitz: this ran from 18 to 24 October, and focused on articles tagged for copy-edit in July and August 2020, and all Requests. Of the 13 who signed up, 11 editors copy-edited at least one article. 21 articles were claimed for the blitz. November Drive: Of the 18 editors who signed up, 15 copy-edited at least one article, and together claimed 134 articles. At the close of the drive, 67 fewer articles were in the backlog and we had dealt with 39 requests. Other news
Progress report: As of 09:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 663 requests (18 from 2019) since 1 January and there were 52 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 494 (see monthly progress graph above). Annual Report for 2020: this roundup of the year's activity at the Guild is planned for publication in late January or early February. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Seasonal tidings and cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Puddleglum2.0, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Getjet Airlines edit
Hi, Neither Aviatic MRO, nor Dmitrij Celiadin or Povilas Padaiga is related to Getjet Airlines. Please create a separate page for Aviatic MRO, if this info seems necessary, since this info should belong under a its' page. AviationLogger (talk) 07:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification, AviationLogger. I'll leave your changes as is, but I can't guarantee other editors will (because edit warring is considered a rule violation). If you can provide some sort of link that shows Aviatic MRO is unrelated (post it here or in the article's talk page), it could be valid reason to create the separate article. Best of luck. Bass77talkcontribs 16:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Article creation
Hye please how can I create an article about a popular teacher Sulehaido (talk) 05:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, Sulehaido. To make an article, you need to start first with a draft article. You can write a draft by going to "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Title", replacing "Title" with the name of your article. Click "start the page" and then write what you want. When you're done, add
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the page. Then, it either gets approved or rejected by a Wikipedia administrator (I am not one of them). Good luck! Bass77talkcontribs 07:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Probable LTA
Special:Contributions/PoeTheJlumber is probably Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/John Daker. Revert on sight. BilCat (talk) 01:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, BilCat. Will do. Bass77talkcontribs 01:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- It could be someone else, but it certainly is their type of edit pattern. It's vandalism either way. BilCat (talk) 02:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Jean Mouroux has a new comment
- @Hatchens: I apologize for the question. I'm new to submitting drafts and hope this doesn't make me sound like a rube, but what exactly was wrong with the reference list? I know the article lacks inline citations, but that's because the {{Cite book}} references are from the page on Spanish Wikipedia, which my draft is a direct translation of. Why is that sufficient for a start-class article there but not here? I'm not trying to contest the decision, I simply want to learn more about the policy for future reference. Thanks in advance, Bass77talkcontribs 07:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Also noting that I did include the {{no footnotes}} template at the top of the article as per Help:Translation#Verifiability: Include citations. Is this help page incorrect? Do I still need to have in-line citations for a draft translation? Bass77talkcontribs 07:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Bass77, thank you raising valid questions. I would suggest .. just reformat the draft and try to source more Citations from Google Scholar or Google Books and then resubmit for review. - Hatchens (talk) 16:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hatchens, Thank you for the response, I appreciate it. I found some relevant citations and added them. Have a nice day! Bass77talkcontribs 17:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Bass77, thank you raising valid questions. I would suggest .. just reformat the draft and try to source more Citations from Google Scholar or Google Books and then resubmit for review. - Hatchens (talk) 16:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Mouroux (June 17)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jean Mouroux and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jean Mouroux, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Bass77!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 06:38, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
|
RAF Spadeadam
Dear Bass77, I have to disagree with your assessment that my revisions to the RAF Spadeadam article have changed the meaning of the sections and are therefore not ‘constructive’ to the article.
On the contrary, my editing has expanded on the original text and provided amplification on certain topics which were very poorly expressed initially. The text also reads better, flows and is grammatically correct. There were elements of the original text which did not even make sense.
You have edited my text to now read ‘ Some of the equipment was manufactured in the Soviet Union; some simulated emissions from potential enemy systems.’ This has completely changed the meaning of this sentence. I was making the point that Spadeadam has a mix of old Soviet era equipment and modern systems which can replicate the radar emissions of more up to date enemy systems. Your changes have completely eradicated that point.
With the greatest respect, as a serving Royal Airforce Officer, I am much better placed to write and speak with some authority about the place where I live and work. I wonder if you have ever visited the location of which you feel eminently qualified to comment on.
For completeness, your phase ‘ ground-based electronics warfare equipment ’ is wrong. It is electronic warfare not ‘electronics’ warfare. As a practitioner of this black art, if I wrote that in any documentation, I’d be laughed out of town.
Your amendment ‘aircrews’ is grammatically incorrect. Aircrew is the correct terminology. Like sheep, they can be singular or plural.
You may also wish to know that there is only one dummy airfield.
I spent a considerable amount of time carefully choosing my words to accurately convey the precise history and current activity of Spadeadam without compromising any security sensitivities. I am unsure why you saw fit to drive a cart and horses through my improvements.
I am of course happy to discuss this further.
Warmest regards, Hectoronimus Hectoronimus (talk) 08:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, Hectoronimus. Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I just want to let you know my edit was only a result of my personal opinion, and you may be right and I might be wrong. That means that you are free to change the article back to how you had it if you want.
- My edits were simply changing the article back to exactly how it was before you edited it, so really nothing has changed (this is called reverting the page, and there is an undo button in the page history for it). If you would like, you can revert it back to your version, or edit it again to your liking. I won't change a thing this time :)
- But please know that if other editors also think that the changes made were not necessary and could have changed the meaning of the article, they can also revert it back like I did, and repeatedly reverting it more than about three times in a row is against Wikipedia policy. Happy editing! Thanks, Bass77talkcontribs 22:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Bass77, As you clearly know more about the mysterious inner workings of Wikipedia , grateful if you could extend me the courtesy of undoing the changes yourself please. Many thanks. Hectoronimus (talk) 14:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, Hectoronimus. I can do that for you soon. Have a good day. Bass77talkcontribs 05:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Alandi
Hiii I AM proper in Alandi Yash tapkir (talk) 08:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the correction. Bass77talkcontribs 05:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Mouroux has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Alandi
Don't change history alandi Devachi Kalbhor-patil is original history Yash tapkir (talk) 05:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Please 🙏🏻 don't change Alandi history kalbhor Patil is original history and Kalbhor-patil is proper Alandi Devachi Yash tapkir (talk) 05:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, Yash tapkir. I'm sorry to let you know that I only changed the Alandi page once. If it got changed again, it was by someone else. So I can't really help you there.
- This might help you though. I know it's a hassle, but if you add a citation people generally won't remove what you put. Click this link for help with doing that. Good luck! Bass77talkcontribs 19:17, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Two Accounts
Dude, may you help me. I don't want my account got removed/terminated Rizky Ramadhan Soundwave (talk) 15:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, Rizky Ramadhan Soundwave. Please do not worry about it! Having a second account is not against the rules as long as you don't edit with both at the same time or pretend to be different people using the two accounts.
- I don't think you're doing that, so you are not in any trouble. The message I sent you was just to let you know the rules, so I apologize if it sounded threatening. Thanks, Bass77talkcontribs 19:17, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors June 2021 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, our first newsletter of 2021, which is a brief update of Guild activities since December 2020. To unsubscribe, follow the link at the bottom of this box. Current events
Election time: Voting in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 16 June and will conclude at the end of the month. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Have your say and show support here. June Blitz: Our June copy-editing blitz is underway and will conclude on 26 June. Drive and blitz reports
January Drive: 28 editors completed 324 copy edits totalling 714,902 words. At the end of the drive, the backlog had reached a record low of 52 articles. (full results) February Blitz: 15 editors completed 48 copy edits totalling 142,788 words. (full results) March Drive: 29 editors completed 215 copy edits totalling 407,736 words. (full results) April Blitz: 12 editors completed 23 copy edits totalling 56,574 words. (full results) May Drive: 29 editors completed 356 copy edits totalling 479,013 words. (full results) Other news
Progress report: as of 26 June, GOCE participants had completed 343 Requests since 1 January. The backlog has fluctuated but remained in control, with a low of 52 tagged articles at the end of January and a high of 620 articles in mid-June. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu and Twofingered Typist, and from member Reidgreg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC).
September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors September 2021 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2021. Current and upcoming events
September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Drive and Blitz reports
June Blitz: From 20 to 26 June, 6 participating editors claimed 16 copy edits, focusing on requests and articles tagged in March and April. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: Almost 575,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 24 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 15 to 21 August, we copy edited articles tagged in April and May 2021 and requests. 9 participating editors completed 17 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Other news
June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. New maintenance template added to our project scope: After a short discussion in June, we added {{cleanup tense}} to the list of maintenance templates that adds articles to the Guild's copy editing backlog categories. This change added 198 articles, spread over 97 months of backlog, to our queue. We processed all of those articles except for those from the three or four most recent months during the July backlog elimination drive (Here's a link to a "tense" discussion during the drive). Progress report: As of 18:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 468 requests since 1 January and there were 60 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
December 2021 GOCE Newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors December 2021 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2021. Current and upcoming events
Election time: Our end-of-year election of coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before "Auld Lang Syne". Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. December Blitz: We have scheduled a week-long copy-editing blitz for 12 to 18 December. Sign up now! Drive and Blitz reports
September Drive: Almost 400,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 27 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. October Blitz: From 17 to 23 October, we copy edited articles tagged in May and June 2021 and requests. 8 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. November Drive: Over 350,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 21 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. Other news
It is with great sadness that we report the death on 19 November of Twofingered Typist, who was active with the Guild almost daily for the past several years. His contributions long exceeded the thresholds for the Guild's highest awards, and he had a hand in innumerable good and featured article promotions as a willing collaborator. Twofingered Typist also served as a Guild coordinator from July 2019 to June 2021. He is sorely missed by the Wikipedia community. Progress report: As of 30 November, GOCE copyeditors have completed 619 requests in 2021 and there were 51 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog stood at 946 articles tagged for copy-editing (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)